Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A compact chronological target supplies a causal endpoint

Statement

Let (E,g,N) be globally hyperbolic in the causal-exterior interface, and let C⊂E be a compact spacelike two-surface in the null-screen interface. Let τ be a temporal function and suppose p∈∂EIE−(C) with τ(p)<min⁡Cτ. Then some c∈C satisfies p≤Ec and p≠c, whereas p∉IE−(C). No acausality of C is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Work in ZFC; the axiom of choice includes the countable and dependent choice assumptions of the causal suppliers. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

All chronological and causal relations, boundaries, temporal functions and global hyperbolicity are relative to E. Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data

[F2]

A spacelike two-surface is a nonempty smooth embedded two-manifold without boundary with positive-definite induced metric. Null expansions, screen quotients and focal data

[F3]
[F6]

A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact space attains its minimum, by the extreme-value clause (2). The restriction of a continuous function to a subspace is continuous. A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism

Proof

Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.

Goal: Establish the asserted conclusion.

1.1A1F1F2F3F4F5given

The set IE−(C)=⋃c∈CIE−(c) is open by [F4] and [F5], so its boundary is disjoint from it. Every point of that set lies in JE−(C); its closure also lies there by [F3]. Thus p∈JE−(C)∖IE−(C).

2.1step 1.1F1F2F6given∎

The temporal function τ is continuous by [F1], so τ∣C is continuous by [F6]. The space C is nonempty by [F2] and compact by hypothesis; clause (2) of [F6] therefore makes min⁡Cτ well defined. By the definition of JE−(C) there is a c∈C with p≤Ec. If p∈C, minimality would give min⁡Cτ≤τ(p), contrary to the strict temporal inequality. Thus p∉C and p≠c. Together with step 1.1 this proves the assertion without any condition on causal relations among different points of C.

Depends on

Used by · 5

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.