Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The first possible shift and lapse logarithms vanish by indicial projection

Statement

In the final spatial normalization of the preceding lemma, every logarithmic coefficient at order r−2 in X and N vanishes. Consequently X=O∞(r−2),N=1−m/r+O∞(r−2). This excludes only the critical logarithms needed for the article end gauge; it does not assert absence of every higher polyhomogeneous logarithm.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The same maximal end has isotropic leading spatial Schwarzschild correction, radial leading lapse and shift beginning at order r−2. Leading stationary modes and a spatial normalization of the same maximal end

[F2]

The maximal vacuum vector, lapse and trace identities hold in every spatial coordinate system. Independent stationary maximal-gauge asymptotic expansion and KID input

[F3]

The self-adjoint operator Delta_S2 plus two has kernel exactly the degree-one spherical harmonics; a constant function is orthogonal to that kernel. Spherical harmonic modes are orthogonal, complete for continuous data, and have polynomial evaluation bounds

[F4]

Work in ZFC, including the inherited analytic choice assumptions. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

Given: The actual end hypotheses in the Statement.

Goal: Prove the stated same-slice end consequence.

1.1F1F2F3givenalgebra

Put P equal to Delta_S2 plus two. Direct differentiation gives Δ0(r−2(log⁡r)ja)=r−4[Pa(log⁡r)j−3ja(log⁡r)j−1+j(j−1)a(log⁡r)j−2]. The vector KID equation, with X=O(r−2log⁡Jr) and k=(2N)−1LXh=O(r−3log⁡Jr), has no r−4 forcing after moving its metric and Ricci corrections to the right: all such terms have order at most r−5 times finite log powers. If J>0 is the largest r−2 shift-log power, its coefficient aJ lies in ker P; projecting the next log coefficient equation onto ker P gives −3JaJ=0. Thus the highest coefficient vanishes, and descending induction removes all positive log powers in the r−2 shift.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Now k=O∞(r−3). For N0=1−m/r and h=(1+2m/r)δ+O(r−2log⁡Jr), the coordinate Laplacian formula gives ΔhN0=−m2r−4+O(r−5log⁡J′r). The lapse equation ΔhN=N∣k∣2 therefore has only radial forcing m2 at the r−4 equation for the r−2 coefficient of N−N0. For a largest positive log power the same projection calculation gives −3JbJ=0: when J=1 the constant-log equation has the radial right side, whose projection onto degree-one harmonics is zero. Hence all positive log powers at this order vanish as well.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The remaining higher-order terms start at r−3 with finite log powers and differentiated remainders. Each such finite log power times r−3 is bounded by a constant times r−2, with the corresponding extra radius factors after every fixed derivative. The full expansion in [F1] therefore proves both displayed O-infinity assertions. No convergence of the formal expansion is required.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.