Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

One extra pointwise derivative supplies scaled Hölder control

Statement

Let m≥0 be an integer, b∈R, and 0<α<1. For a smooth scalar or finite component array on a Cartesian end E={x∈R3:∣x∣>R0}, where R0>0 and r=∣x∣, the differentiated bound f=Om+1(r−b) implies an eventual weighted Cm,α bound of decay order b. Precisely, writing AR={x:R<∣x∣<2R}, there are R∗>R0 and C<∞ such that, for every R≥R∗ and every component, ∑∣β∣≤mRb+∣β∣sup⁡AR∣∂βf∣+∑∣β∣=mRb+m+α[∂βf]α;AR≤C. Here [v]α;A=sup⁡x,y∈A, x≠y∣v(x)−v(y)∣/∣x−y∣α. In this item the notation f∈C−bm,α means exactly this eventual annular bound; it imposes no boundedness as r approaches R0.

The same conclusion holds with a common R∗ and C for families whose input bounds have a common radius and constants. In particular, stationary coefficient errors g00+1 and gij−δij satisfying O5(r−1) have eventual C−14,α control, and a mixed component g0i=O5(r−2) has eventual C−24,α control. Equivalently their rescalings R(g00+1)(R ⋅), R(gij−δij)(R ⋅) and R2g0i(R ⋅) have bounded ordinary C4,α norms on the fixed annulus A1, uniformly for sufficiently large R.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Differentiated end bounds use Cartesian multi-index derivatives and an eventual common exterior radius. The weighted Hölder bound is defined by the displayed annular expression; for families uniformity requires a common radius and constants. Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity

[F2]

Ordinary Hölder norms consist of derivative suprema and top-derivative difference quotients. Radius powers account for derivative and seminorm rescaling. Hölder spaces C^k,α, closure and interior scaled norms, and C^k,α domains

[F3]

A real function continuous on a closed interval and differentiable in its interior has its endpoint difference equal to the interval length times an interior derivative. We use this scalar mean value theorem on coordinate segments, separately on real and imaginary parts if needed. The mean value theorem, as the case g(x) = x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a < b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c ∈ (a,b) with f(b) - f(a) = f'(c)(b-a)

Proof

Given: The differentiated end bound in the Statement, with radius R1>R0 and constants common to the finitely many components and, for a uniform family, to all parameters.

Goal: Prove the eventual annular bound, its uniformity assertion and the coefficient examples.

1.1givenF1F2algebra

For R≥2R1 put fR(y)=Rbf(Ry) on the fixed enlarged annulus U={y:1/2<∣y∣<3}. Coordinate differentiation gives ∂βfR(y)=Rb+∣β∣(∂βf)(Ry). The input bound implies ∣∂βfR(y)∣≤Cβ∣y∣−b−∣β∣ for ∣β∣≤m+1. Since 1/2<∣y∣<3 and there are finitely many multi-indices and components, one finite number M≥0, independent of R, bounds all these derivatives on U. For a uniform family the same M works for every parameter.

2.1step 1.1F2F3algebra

Fix one component and ∣β∣=m, and put v=∂βfR. If p,q∈A1 and 0<∣p−q∣<1/4, change the three coordinates of p successively to those of q. Every point of these three coordinate segments is within distance ∣p−q∣ of p, so lies in B1/4(p)⊂U. On each nondegenerate segment, v is smooth, hence continuous at both endpoints and differentiable in its interior, with the relevant coordinate derivative bounded by M. Applying [F3] to each real component and summing the three endpoint differences gives ∣v(p)−v(q)∣≤6M∣p−q∣, where the factor six also accommodates complex components by treating real and imaginary parts separately. Thus the Hölder quotient for these pairs is at most 6M(1/4)1−α. If ∣p−q∣≥1/4, the supremum bound gives a quotient at most 2M4α. Consequently [∂βfR]α;A1 is bounded independently of R, and together with step 1.1 this bounds the ordinary Cm,α norm of fR on A1. No convexity of the entire annulus is assumed.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1F2algebra∎

The dilation x=Ry bijects A1 with AR, and its difference quotients give [∂βfR]α;A1=Rb+∣β∣+α[∂βf]α;AR. The derivative suprema obey the corresponding identity without the factor Rα. Summing the finitely many bounds in steps 1.1 and 2.1 proves the displayed weighted bound for R≥R∗=2R1. Common input bounds give the same M, R∗ and final constant for the whole family. Finally take m=4 and b=1 for the time and spatial coefficient errors, and m=4 and b=2 for each mixed component; steps 1.1 and 2.1 also give exactly the stated fixed-annulus rescaled bounds. These conclusions concern only the sufficiently far-out end specified in the Statement.

Depends on

Used by · 6

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.