Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hopf positivity and uniform linear growth on a fixed compact collar

Statement

Let S be a nonempty compact smooth boundary of a smooth Riemannian exterior. Suppose u∈C2(Σ∘)∩Cloc1(Σ) is positive inside, vanishes on S, and satisfies (Δh−V)u≤0 with smooth V≥0. Then ∂νinu>0 at every point of S, where νin is the metric unit inward normal. On some fixed compact collar, u≥c0ρ with c0>0, for the collar coordinate ρ or the metric distance to S.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Smooth boundary, the Riemannian metric and the Laplacian convention are those of Weighted exterior elliptic domains and admissible weights. The inward unit normal is the vector orthogonal to TyS, of h-norm one, pointing into Σ. The regularity Cloc1(Σ) includes continuous first derivatives up to the boundary in boundary charts.

[F2]

The tangent-ball derivative conclusion is supplied by A variable-coefficient annular barrier and inward boundary derivative. Smoothness of the metric and potential on a sufficiently small closed chart ball gives its coefficient bounds and uniform ellipticity.

[F3]

Work in ZFC, including The Axiom of Choice and the choice assumptions inherited through the barrier supplier. In particular the Countable Choice hypothesis of Collar neighborhood theorem holds. Fix its smooth collar F:S×[0,ϵ)→Σ, a smooth embedding onto a relatively open neighbourhood of S with F(y,0)=y. Its coordinate is ρ(F(y,t))=t. The vector ∂tF(y,0) is strictly inward and transverse, since F is a collar embedding.

[F4]

A continuous real function on a nonempty compact space attains its minimum and maximum, and a continuous image of a compact space is compact, by A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism. The interval [0,δ] is compact for δ>0 by Closed real intervals are compact by completeness, and its product with compact S is compact by A product of finitely many compact spaces is compact in the product topology. Compactness also means that every open cover has a finite subcover; the common collar width will be obtained by that property directly.

[F5]

The closed-interval mean value theorem Mean value theorem on a closed real interval applies to a real function continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b). The supplier Continuous functions have an oriented Riemann integral defines the Riemann integral of continuous real functions on compact intervals, proves its interval additivity, and gives m(b−a)≤∫abg(s) ds≤M(b−a) whenever m≤g≤M and a<b. These are used over the real numbers with the complete ordered-field structure of Dedekind-complete ordered real field.

[F6]

For the distance formulation, curves are continuous maps γ:[a,b]→Σ that are C1 on each piece of a finite subdivision a=t0<⋯<tN=b, up to the piece endpoints in interior or boundary charts; endpoint derivatives are one-sided. They are allowed to lie on or meet S. Define Lh(γ)=∑j=1N∫tj−1tjhγ(s)(γ˙(s),γ˙(s)) ds. Each speed is continuous on its closed piece, so [F5] makes the length finite and nonnegative. At a subdivision point each adjacent piece uses its own one-sided derivative. Interval additivity gives invariance under refinement, and a common refinement gives independence of subdivision. For a=b, set Lh(γ)=0. Define dh(x,S) to be the infimum of Lh(γ) over all these curves starting at any point of S and ending at x, with inf⁡∅=+∞. A nonempty family of lengths has an infimum in [0,∞) by the completeness axiom in math:def-complete-ordered-real-field, applied to the negatives of the nonnegative lengths. Thus this distance-to-subset construction applies to manifolds with boundary and disconnected exteriors, including components not joined to S; finiteness on the collar will follow from its explicit curves.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement and the data and suppliers in [F1]–[F6].

Goal: Establish the conclusions of the Statement.

Proof technique: direct.

1.1F1F2given

In a boundary chart flatten the smooth boundary to a coordinate plane. A sufficiently small Euclidean ball in the half-space is tangent at the chosen boundary point and has closure in the chart. Apply [F2] to obtain a positive inward transverse derivative. All tangential derivatives vanish because u∣S=0. Its differential is therefore a positive multiple of the inward conormal, proving the strict positivity for the metric unit inward normal as well as for every smooth strictly inward transverse vector.

2.1F3F4step 1.1givenchoose

Put B(y,t)=∂t(u∘F)(y,t) and a(y)=B(y,0). These functions are continuous up to t=0, and a(y)>0 by step 1.1 and [F3]. Since S is nonempty and compact, [F4] gives a∗:=min⁡Sa>0. Fix 0<b<ϵ. For each y∈S, continuity of B gives an open neighbourhood Uy⊂S and a width 0<ηy<b such that B(z,t)>a∗/2 for z∈Uy and 0≤t<ηy. A finite subcover Uy1,…,Uym of S exists by compactness. Choose 0<δ<min⁡iηyi. Every z∈S then lies in one of these sets, so B(z,t)≥a∗/2 for all 0≤t≤δ. This proves the common width directly.

3.1F1F3F4step 2.1construct

By [F4], S×[0,δ] is compact and its continuous image Kδ:=F(S×[0,δ]) is a compact collar. The speed q(y,t):=hF(y,t)(∂tF(y,t),∂tF(y,t)) is continuous there by smoothness of h and F. Its maximum exists by [F4]; put C:=max⁡(1,max⁡S×[0,δ]q). Thus 0≤q≤C and C≥1.

3.2F3F5step 2.1given

For fixed y and 0<t≤δ, the function s↦u(F(y,s)) is continuous on [0,t] and differentiable on (0,t) with derivative B(y,s). By [F5] there is θ∈(0,t) with u(F(y,t))−u(F(y,0))=tB(y,θ)≥a∗t/2. Since u(F(y,0))=0, this proves u(F(y,t))≥a∗t/2; the same inequality holds at t=0. The closed-interval hypotheses include the boundary endpoint, so this argument uses exactly the stated regularity.

4.1F3F5F6step 3.1step 3.2algebra∎

For x=F(y,t), 0≤t≤δ, the curve s↦F(y,s) on [0,t] starts at y∈S, ends at x, and stays in Σ. Its length, as defined in [F6], is ∫0tq(y,s) ds≤Ct by [F5] and step 3.1. Hence 0≤dh(x,S)≤Ct<∞. Combining this with step 3.2 yields u(x)≥(a∗/2C)dh(x,S). With c0=a∗/(2C)>0, the same constant also gives u(x)≥c0ρ(x), since C≥1 and ρ(x)=t. The constants depend on the actual solution and collar; no uniform family bound follows solely from pointwise Hopf positivity.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.