Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The complete stationary flow preserves the selected causal exterior

Statement

Use the global stationary comparison data, and set Mext=⋃t∈Rϕt(Sext) and D=IM+(Mext)∩IM−(Mext). For every s∈R, ϕs(Mext)=Mext and ϕs(D)=D. Thus the stationary symmetry acts on the entire specified exterior; a restriction of its flow to a small neighborhood would not supply this conclusion for arbitrary times.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The comparison data supply a smooth time-oriented spacetime (M,g,N) and a complete stationary Killing flow ϕt generated by T, defined on all of M for every real time. The Killing condition is LTg=0. Smooth global data for the axisymmetric comparison Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data

[F2]

Chronological futures and pasts are defined by future timelike curves in the specified ambient manifold. Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data

[F3]

A global flow is smooth on R×M, satisfies ϕ0=idM and ϕs∘ϕt=ϕs+t, and hence each ϕs has smooth inverse ϕ−s. Local and global flows generated by a vector field

[F4]

For a smooth tensor field A and a smooth vector field X with flow Φt, the condition LXA=0 implies Φt∗A=A at all defined times. Apply this to A=g and X=T using the Killing condition in F1. A tensor field is flow-invariant exactly when its Lie derivative vanishes

Proof

Given: The data and assumptions in the Statement.

Goal: Establish the claimed conditional conclusion.

1.1F1F3F4givenalgebra

The global flow law gives ϕs(⋃tϕt(Sext))=⋃tϕs+t(Sext)=Mext. Applying F4 to g and T gives ϕs∗g=g for every real s, so each ϕs is an isometry. Each ϕs preserves time orientation: its derivative maps timelike vectors continuously as s varies from zero, where ϕ0=idM, so a future timelike vector cannot cross to the other timelike component.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra∎

Composing a future timelike curve with the time-orientation-preserving isometry ϕs gives such a curve with the corresponding image endpoints. Applying also its inverse ϕ−s yields ϕs(IM±(Mext))=IM±(Mext). Intersect the two equalities. Completeness is used in the first step and in the inverse for all real s; no local-to-global extension is proved.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.