Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth global data for the axisymmetric comparison

Definition

Work in ZFC, including choice. Use the supplied stationary Lorentzian and causal conventions. The global comparison data consist of a smooth connected time-oriented four-dimensional spacetime (M,g,N) with a specified asymptotically flat spacelike end Sext and a complete stationary Killing flow ϕt generated by T, future timelike on that end, together with a smooth effective axial circle action ψs of period 2π by isometries. Require these actions to commute. End decay, Mext, D=IM+(Mext)∩IM−(Mext), I+-regularity and regular axis have exactly the predicates of the supplied black-hole comparison-hypothesis interface. Use the supplied normalized circle-action convention. Require the future event horizon to be connected.

When retaining the original item's mean-nondegeneracy assumption, supply a smooth compact horizon section S without boundary and compatible Gaussian-null coordinate patches near it of the form g=rφ dv2+2 dv dr+2rha dxadv+hab dxadxb, with horizon r=0 and section v=r=0 in these patches. Require their section restrictions to define a single global smooth scalar φS:S→R and a smooth positive-definite metric h on S: on overlapping section charts the coefficients φ∣S agree as scalar values and hab∣S obey the metric tensor transition law. Let dμh be the intrinsic Riemannian density and interpret ∫SφS dμh by the supplied compactly supported smooth-density integration interface. The relevant mean condition is ∫SφS dμh≠0 in that supplied normalization. This is a nonvanishing predicate; no numerical surface-gravity normalization or implication to a Killing horizon is asserted. It is an optional additional hypothesis for the imported smooth axisymmetric classification, whose source theorem does not need it.

For a specified comparison spacetime, supply separate stationary Lorentzian data (M~,g~,N~,T~) with a selected asymptotically flat spacelike end S~ext and complete stationary Killing flow ϕ~t, future timelike on that end. Apply the same end and causal-exterior conventions to these data, setting M~ext=⋃t∈Rϕ~t(S~ext) and D~=IM~+(M~ext)∩IM~−(M~ext). A global metric classification of the exterior by this comparison spacetime means that there exists a diffeomorphism F:D→D~ satisfying F∗(g~∣D~)=g∣D. Diffeomorphism and tensor pullback use their supplied mathematical definitions. This does not mean an isometry of all extensions beyond the horizons.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

ZFC and the supplied geometric interfaces define the ambient objects, causal exterior, complete stationary flow, regular axis and normalized circle action, for the original and separately supplied comparison data. The global regularity predicates are imposed in full. The Axiom of Choice Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions Staticity, axisymmetry and black-hole regularity hypotheses Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data Periodic isometries and invariant normal averaging

[F2]

On a Riemannian manifold, a smooth compactly supported real function times the intrinsic Riemannian density has a finite intrinsic integral, without an orientation; countable choice suffices for the chart-partition selection and is available in ZFC. Riemannian volume of a compactly supported smooth density The Axiom of Choice

[F3]

A diffeomorphism is a bijective smooth map with smooth inverse. Pullback of a covariant tensor is defined using the differential of its smooth map. Diffeomorphisms and local diffeomorphisms of manifolds The pullback of a covariant tensor field

[F4]

The independent source supplies the Gaussian-null mean nonvanishing criterion for supplied smooth compact-section data, as recorded in External input. Compatible global section coefficients are explicitly required here rather than inferred from compactness.

Justification

Given: The supplied end, global flows, causal data, optional compatible Gaussian-null section data and, when a comparison is specified, its separate spacetime data.

Goal: Verify that these define precise conditional comparison data.

1.1 Complete flow and circle-action predicates specify maps for all real parameters, while the causal interface and the comparison-hypothesis supplier determine Mext, D and the full I+-regularity predicate. Commutation, regular-axis and horizon-connectedness are separate stated conditions; none is inferred from a local Killing field. [given, F1]

1.2 For the optional mean condition, the required overlap compatibility supplies a global smooth φS and Riemannian metric h. The support of φS is a closed subset of compact S, hence compact. Thus the density-integration interface applies under ZFC and makes its scalar integral finite and the nonzero test meaningful in the supplied normalization. Multiplication by a nonzero fixed normalization factor does not change whether the integral vanishes. No existence or gauge-independence of these Gaussian-null data is deduced. [given, F1, F2, F4]

2.1 Applying the same exterior construction to the separate comparison data fixes M~ext and D~ in the ambient M~. The diffeomorphism and tensor-pullback interfaces then make the displayed condition on F a definite predicate, exactly the stipulated isometry between the entire exteriors. No such map or comparison spacetime is asserted to exist by this definition. These definitions require no rigidity, nondegeneracy bridge or classification result. [given, F1, F3, step 1.1, step 1.2] ∎

External input

Chruściel–Costa–Heusler supplies the end, stationarity, exterior and I+-regularity definitions, axial terminology and the Gaussian-null mean criterion under the recorded hypotheses and reading limits. Theorem 3.2 omits mean-nondegeneracy. Only that omission is noted here; its classification is not proved or applied in this definition. No numerical surface-gravity identity is used.

Depends on

Used by · 7

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

P. T. Chruściel, J. L. Costa and M. Heusler, Stationary Black Holes: Uniqueness and Beyond · §2.1 and §§2.3–2.4 (PDF pp. 5–6); §2.5.3, equations (2.20)–(2.21) (PDF p. 10); §2.6, Definition 2.1 (PDF pp. 10–11); §3.2.1 (PDF p. 13); §3.2.7, Theorem 3.2 (PDF p. 15).

Complete stationarity, causal exterior and I-plus-regularity are defined relative to a selected end. The Gaussian-null mean condition uses the integral of the section coefficient against its induced density. Section 3.2.1 describes periodic axial symmetry; Theorem 3.2 has no mean-nondegeneracy hypothesis.

Hypotheses: Specified smooth time-oriented four-dimensional spacetime, asymptotically flat end and complete stationary flow. The mean condition presupposes supplied Gaussian-null data and a smooth compact section. Effectiveness, commutation, regular axis and compatible section coefficients are explicit local data, not consequences of the source.

Reading limits: Read the web PDF text at the cited definitions, equations, axial-symmetry paragraph and theorem statement. Only the mean nonvanishing criterion and the stated terminology are imported here; no Gaussian-null existence, coefficient gluing, horizon smoothness, zeroth law or classification proof was reconstructed. The absence of a mean hypothesis was checked in the theorem statement. No numerical surface-gravity identification or visual PDF inspection is claimed.

Sources