Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Commuting complete flows give the global product action

Statement

For the supplied global flows, the map α((t,[s]),p)=ϕt(ψs(p)) defines a smooth isometric action of R×(R/2πZ). Here [s] denotes the class of s modulo 2π. This uses the supplied global action convention; it asserts no extension of a locally defined symmetry.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Work in the ZFC convention of the global comparison data. Both supplied flows are global isometries, the axial flow is 2π-periodic, and the flows commute. The circle-action convention fixes that period. Smooth global data for the axisymmetric comparison Periodic isometries and invariant normal averaging

[F2]

A global flow is jointly smooth in parameter and point, has value the identity at parameter zero, and satisfies the flow law for all real parameters. Local and global flows generated by a vector field

[F3]

Smooth multiplication and inversion define a finite-dimensional real Lie group. Under countable choice, the quotient by a closed normal subgroup is a Lie group; the quotient-manifold theorem makes its projection a smooth surjective submersion. The constant-rank theorem gives local projection coordinates for a submersion. Lie group Quotient by a closed normal subgroup is a Lie group Quotient manifold by a closed Lie subgroup The constant-rank theorem for manifolds

[F4]

Products carry their canonical product smooth structures. Maps into a product are smooth exactly when their components are smooth, and composites of smooth maps are smooth. Products of smooth manifolds have a canonical product smooth structure A map into a product is smooth iff its components are smooth Identity maps and composites of smooth maps are smooth

[F5]

A smooth left action is a jointly smooth map satisfying the identity and action laws. Smooth left actions of Lie groups

[F6]

Full choice implies countable choice, so the quotient theorems' choice hypothesis is available in the inherited ZFC convention. AC implies DC implies countable choice

Proof

Given: The supplied global commuting isometric flows with their inherited ZFC convention.

Goal: Verify the smooth product-group action, including joint smoothness on the quotient parameters.

1.1F1F3F6

The usual smooth real line is a Lie group under addition: addition and negation have polynomial coordinate formulas. Put Λ=2πZ. This is a subgroup, and it is normal because addition is abelian. It is closed: for x∉Λ, choose a bounded open interval about x. Only finitely many integer multiples of the positive number 2π lie in that interval, and a smaller interval about x avoids those finitely many points. Thus the complement of Λ is open. Countable choice follows from the supplied ZFC convention.

2.1F3F4step 1.1

Apply the quotient theorems to obtain the quotient Lie group C=R/Λ, with addition [s]+[v]=[s+v], and the smooth surjective submersion q:R→C. Near each c∈C, the constant-rank coordinates express q as a projection; fixing the discarded coordinates gives a smooth section σ:U→R with q∘σ=idU. Give G=R×C the product smooth structure and componentwise addition. Its multiplication and inversion are smooth by the component and composition rules, so it is a Lie group with identity (0,[0]).

3.1F1F2F4step 2.1

Periodicity gives ψs+2πn=ψs for every integer n, so the formula for α is independent of the representative of [s]. On R×U×M, using a section from step 2.1, it is α((t,c),p)=ϕt(ψσ(c)(p)). The two flows are jointly smooth, and the component and composition rules make this local expression jointly smooth in all three variables. Such neighborhoods cover G×M, proving joint smoothness of α.

4.1F1F2F5step 2.1step 3.1∎

The zero-parameter flow identities give α((0,[0]),p)=p. For a=(t,[s]) and b=(u,[v]), commutation and the flow laws give ϕtψsϕuψv=ϕt+uψs+v, hence α(a,α(b,p))=α(a+b,p) for every p. Together with joint smoothness, these are precisely the smooth left-action axioms. Each action map is an isometry: applying the metric-preservation identity successively to the differentials of ψs and ϕt preserves g under their composite. Thus the claimed global smooth isometric action is obtained from the supplied global flows.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.