Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Quotient manifold by a closed Lie subgroup

Statement

Assume ACω. If H is a closed subgroup of a finite-dimensional real Lie group G, then the left-coset space G/H, with its quotient topology, has a unique smooth manifold structure for which

q:GG/H,q(g)=gH,

is a surjective submersion and the left G-action is smooth. Moreover, dim(G/H)=dimGdimH.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, a finite-dimensional real Lie group G, and a closed subgroup HG.

[A1]

Under countable choice, H has its unique embedded Lie-subgroup structure. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), Cartan closed subgroup theorem.

[F1]

A finite-dimensional subspace admits a linear projection, without any additional choice. Finite-dimensional subspaces admit projections without Choice.

[F2]

A smooth map with invertible differential is a local diffeomorphism. The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds.

[F3]

The exponential map is smooth and has identity differential at zero. The Lie-group exponential map is smooth with identity differential at zero.

[F5]

A smooth submersion has local projection form and therefore admits a smooth local section near each point in its image; a surjective submersion therefore has such a section near every target point. The constant-rank theorem for manifolds.

Proof

technique · local complements and translated quotient charts
1.1

By [A1], put g=TeG and h=TeH. By [F1], choose a linear projection of g onto h and put m equal to its kernel, so g=mh.

A1F1
1.2

Give G/H the quotient topology. The map q is open, since q1(q(O))=OH=hHOh for every open OG. It is Hausdorff: the orbit relation R={(g1,g2):g11g2H} is closed, and for two inequivalent points choose a product neighborhood O1×O2 disjoint from R; the open sets q(O1) and q(O2) are then disjoint. Images of a countable basis of G form a countable basis of G/H.

givenF4algebra
2.1

Define Ψ:m×HG by Ψ(X,h)=exp(X)h. By [F3], its differential at (0,e) is (X,Y)X+Y, an isomorphism by step 1.1. By [F2], after restricting to neighborhoods Wm and VH, Ψ is a diffeomorphism W×VU, where U is an identity neighborhood.

F2F3step 1.1
3.1

Shrink W and U so that if X,YW and exp(X)1exp(Y)H, then this element lies in V. This is possible by continuity at (0,0). Uniqueness in the product chart then gives X=Y. Hence S=exp(W) meets each left coset represented in U exactly once. Also q(U)=q(S), because Ψ(X,h)H=exp(X)H.

step 2.1algebra
4.1

The bijection qS:Sq(U) from step 3.1 is a homeomorphism. Indeed, qS is continuous. If A=exp(B)S is open, with BW open, then Ψ(B×V) is open in G and has quotient image exactly q(A); openness of q from step 1.2 makes q(A) open. Thus Xexp(X)H is a chart from W onto q(U). In this chart and the product chart of step 2.1, q is (X,h)X.

step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1
5.1

Translate this chart: for gG, use gS over q(gU). Fix a coset in q(gU)q(gU), represented in the first chart by z=gexp(X0). Since its coset is also represented in gU, there is h0H with zh0gU. The set gU is open, so for X in a neighbourhood of X0 inside the first chart, gexp(X)h0gU. Apply the inverse of the translated product diffeomorphism gΨ:W×VgU to this smooth representative and take its m-component. Right multiplication by the fixed h0 does not change the coset, so this component is exactly the second-chart coordinate of q(gexpX). It is smooth near X0; reversing the roles of g,g proves the reverse transition smooth. These charts therefore form a smooth atlas. By step 4.1, q is locally a projection and hence a surjective submersion of rank dimm. Thus dim(G/H)=dimm=dimGdimH.

step 2.1step 4.1constructalgebra
6.1

The action map a:G×G/HG/H is smooth. Near any (g0,x0), choose a local smooth section s of q around x0 from step 5.1. There a(g,x)=q(gs(x)), a composite of smooth maps. This expression is independent of the lift because q(gsh)=q(gs).

step 5.1algebra
7.1

Suppose another smooth structure with the same quotient topology makes q a surjective submersion. By [F5], that submersion and the constructed one have smooth local sections. On a neighborhood carrying a section s of the constructed quotient, the identity from the constructed quotient to the other one is qothers; using a section s of the other quotient gives qconstructeds in the reverse direction. Hence the identity is a diffeomorphism, proving uniqueness. If H=G the quotient is a point; if H={e} the construction recovers G. Disconnected and zero-dimensional groups are included. Countable choice is used through [A1] and [F3]. The finite-dimensional projection, inverse-function, quotient-topology, and constant-rank arguments add no choice.

A1F3F5step 5.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources