How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every orbit is an injectively immersed homogeneous space
Statement
Assume . For a smooth action of on and , the map
is a -equivariant injective immersion with image . Transporting the quotient structure through this map gives the orbit its canonical immersed homogeneous-space structure. The immersion need not be an embedding.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth left action of on and a point .
The stabilizer is a closed embedded Lie subgroup. Stabilizers are closed embedded Lie subgroups.
For a closed subgroup, is a smooth homogeneous manifold and the quotient map is a submersion. Quotient manifold by a closed Lie subgroup.
The kernel of the orbit-map differential at the identity is , and its tangent image is the infinitesimal orbit. Kernel of the infinitesimal orbit map.
Constant-rank normal forms describe immersed images locally. The constant-rank theorem for manifolds.
The preceding closed-subgroup and quotient results carry countable choice. The Axiom of Countable Choice ().
Proof
If , then and , so the formula is well defined. Conversely, equality of the two orbit points puts in , proving injectivity. Every orbit point is , so the image is exactly .
For , , so the map is -equivariant.
By [F2], the quotient map is a submersion and has smooth local sections. Since , on the domain of such a section one has , proving smoothness. If and , choose with . Then , so [F3] gives and hence . Equivariance from step 2.1 transports this injectivity to every coset. Thus the factor is an injective immersion.
The local form [F4] now makes the image locally an immersed coordinate plane, and transport along the bijection in step 1.1 gives the canonical intrinsic orbit structure. The induced -action is smooth and transitive by step 2.1. If , the orbit is a zero-dimensional point; if , its dimension is . Self-accumulating immersed orbits are allowed, which is why embeddedness is not asserted. is used through [F1]--[F3], and no further choice is made.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof, MIT 18.745 Lie Groups and Lie Algebras I (standard reference, not scraped)