How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Transitive smooth actions identify M with G/H
Statement
Assume . If a Lie group acts smoothly and transitively on a smooth manifold , then for every the map
is a -equivariant diffeomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , a transitive smooth left action of on , and .
The induced map is a smooth equivariant injective immersion; transitivity makes it bijective. The Axiom of Countable Choice (), Every orbit is an injectively immersed homogeneous space, Quotient manifold by a closed Lie subgroup.
Critical values of a smooth map are null, and a null set cannot be all of a positive-dimensional manifold. Morse-Sard for smooth manifolds, A null set has dense complement in a positive-dimensional manifold.
An invertible differential gives a local diffeomorphism. The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds.
Proof
Put and . Since is an immersion, its differential is injective everywhere, so . If , this forces . Assume .
If , no differential of is surjective, so every point in its image is a critical value. But is surjective by transitivity, so all of would be a null set by Morse–Sard [F1]. The dense-complement result [F1] would then say that the empty complement of is dense, impossible because contains . Therefore .
The injective differential of is now an isomorphism everywhere. By [F2], is a local diffeomorphism. A bijective local diffeomorphism has a smooth inverse, since its local inverses agree with its unique set-theoretic inverse. Thus is a diffeomorphism; its equivariance was already proved in [A1]. Zero-dimensional and disconnected cases are included. Countable choice is inherited through [A1].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof, MIT 18.745 Lie Groups and Lie Algebras I (standard reference, not scraped)