How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Free and proper Lie-group actions
Definition
A smooth action of a Lie group on a manifold is free if for every .
It is proper if its action-graph map
is proper: is compact for every compact . The reversed coordinate convention is equivalent by the factor-swap homeomorphism. Freeness and properness are independent conditions; neither is encoded by the other.
Depends on
Used by
- A free irrational torus action that is not proper Counterexample
- A proper nonfree action is not a principal bundle Counterexample
- Integer translations on the line Example
- A free action need not have a manifold quotient False statement
- Local slice for a free proper action Lemma
- Compact Lie-group actions are proper Proposition
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)