Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Integer translations on the line

Example

Give Z its discrete zero-dimensional Lie-group structure and let it act smoothly on R by

n⋅x=x+n.

This action is free and proper. Its orbit quotient is diffeomorphic to S1, and, under that identification, the orbit map is the principal Z-bundle

p:R⟶S1,p(x)=e2πix.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The discrete Lie group Z, the usual smooth line R, and the displayed translation action.

[F1]

Any countable discrete group is a zero-dimensional Lie group. Lie group.

[F3]

A smooth free proper left action makes its orbit projection, for the equivalent right action x⋅n=(−n)⋅x=x−n, a principal bundle. Free and proper Lie-group actions, A free proper action makes M to M/G a principal bundle.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenF1algebra

Addition gives 0⋅x=x and (m+n)⋅x=m⋅(n⋅x), so the formula is a left action. It is smooth because its restriction to every open component {n}×R is the smooth translation x↦x+n. If n⋅x=x, then n=0, so the action is free.

2.1F2step 1.1

The action is proper. Let K⊆R2 be compact and write Θ(n,x)=(x+n,x). The continuous coordinate projections and difference map (a,b)↦a−b send K to compact, hence bounded, subsets P and D of R by [F2]. Thus the first coordinate of every (n,x)∈Θ−1(K) lies in the finite set E=Z∩D, while x∈P. The set E is finite and therefore compact; hence E×P is compact by [F2]. Because compact K is closed and Θ is continuous, Θ−1(K) is closed in Z×R, and consequently is a closed subspace of the compact set E×P. It is compact by [F2], proving properness.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

The map p(x)=e2πix is constant on translation orbits. Conversely, p(x)=p(y) exactly when x−y∈Z, so it induces a bijection pˉ:R/Z→S1. For every z0=e2πix0, the restriction of p to (x0−12,x0+12) maps each sufficiently short subinterval diffeomorphically onto an open arc about z0, with a smooth argument branch as inverse. These local inverse branches show that p is a covering map and, using the quotient slice charts supplied by the free proper action, that pˉ and pˉ−1 are smooth. Thus pˉ is a diffeomorphism.

4.1F3step 2.1step 3.1∎

By [F3], the orbit projection R→R/Z is a principal Z-bundle for the right action x⋅n=x−n. Transporting its base along the diffeomorphism pˉ from step 3.1 gives precisely p:R→S1. This verifies every claim, including both the quotient smooth structure and the principal-bundle assertion, without any choice principle.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources