Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Integer translations on the line

Example

Give Z its discrete zero-dimensional Lie-group structure and let it act smoothly on R by

nx=x+n.

This action is free and proper. Its orbit quotient is diffeomorphic to S1, and, under that identification, the orbit map is the principal Z-bundle

p:RS1,p(x)=e2πix.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The discrete Lie group Z, the usual smooth line R, and the displayed translation action.

[F1]

Any countable discrete group is a zero-dimensional Lie group. Lie group.

[F3]

A smooth free proper left action makes its orbit projection, for the equivalent right action xn=(n)x=xn, a principal bundle. Free and proper Lie-group actions, A free proper action makes M to M/G a principal bundle.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Addition gives 0x=x and (m+n)x=m(nx), so the formula is a left action. It is smooth because its restriction to every open component {n}×R is the smooth translation xx+n. If nx=x, then n=0, so the action is free.

givenF1algebra
2.1

The action is proper. Let KR2 be compact and write Θ(n,x)=(x+n,x). The continuous coordinate projections and difference map (a,b)ab send K to compact, hence bounded, subsets P and D of R by [F2]. Thus the first coordinate of every (n,x)Θ1(K) lies in the finite set E=ZD, while xP. The set E is finite and therefore compact; hence E×P is compact by [F2]. Because compact K is closed and Θ is continuous, Θ1(K) is closed in Z×R, and consequently is a closed subspace of the compact set E×P. It is compact by [F2], proving properness.

F2step 1.1
3.1

The map p(x)=e2πix is constant on translation orbits. Conversely, p(x)=p(y) exactly when xyZ, so it induces a bijection pˉ:R/ZS1. For every z0=e2πix0, the restriction of p to (x012,x0+12) maps each sufficiently short subinterval diffeomorphically onto an open arc about z0, with a smooth argument branch as inverse. These local inverse branches show that p is a covering map and, using the quotient slice charts supplied by the free proper action, that pˉ and pˉ1 are smooth. Thus pˉ is a diffeomorphism.

step 1.1step 2.1algebra
4.1

By [F3], the orbit projection RR/Z is a principal Z-bundle for the right action xn=xn. Transporting its base along the diffeomorphism pˉ from step 3.1 gives precisely p:RS1. This verifies every claim, including both the quotient smooth structure and the principal-bundle assertion, without any choice principle.

F3step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources