Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A free irrational torus action that is not proper

Statement refuted

False claim: every smooth free action of a Lie group on a manifold is proper and has a Hausdorff orbit quotient.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An irrational number α and T2=S1×S1 with its usual smooth structure.

[F1]

A left action is free when all stabilizers are trivial, and it is proper when (t,x)↦(t⋅x,x) has compact inverse images of compact sets. Free and proper Lie-group actions.

[F2]

For irrational α, the displayed action is smooth and free and all its orbits are dense. The irrational torus flow is free with dense orbits.

[F3]

The wrap-metric circle T=[0,1) is compact, and finite products of compact spaces are compact. The unit-interval circle is a nonempty compact metric space, A product of finitely many compact spaces is compact in the product topology.

Counterexample

technique · constructive
1.1givenF1F2construct

Define the R-action on T2 by t⋅(z,w)=(e2πitz,e2πiαtw). By [F2], it is a smooth free left action.

2.1F2step 1.1

Every orbit is dense by [F2].

2.2F1F3F4step 1.1

The action is not proper. The map u↦e2πiu identifies the wrap-metric circle in [F3] with the complex unit circle S1: their chordal distance is ∣e2πiu−e2πiv∣=2sin⁡(πd(u,v)), so the map is a homeomorphism. Thus [F3] makes S1, then T2×T2, compact. The full inverse image of this compact target under the action-graph map is R×T2. Were it compact, its continuous projection onto R would make R compact by [F4], contrary to the open cover {(−n,n):n≥1}, which has no finite subcover.

3.1F1step 2.1step 2.2discharge-construct: counterexample complete∎

The quotient is not Hausdorff. Each orbit is a proper dense subset: it is dense by step 2.1. For a point (z,w), choose θ∈R with z=e2πiθ. Its orbit meets {1}×S1 only at the countable set {(1,e2πiα(n−θ)w):n∈Z}, so it cannot contain the whole circle {1}×S1 and is therefore proper. If the quotient were Hausdorff, a singleton orbit class would be closed and its inverse image under the quotient map would be a closed orbit, contradicting density and properness. This free, nonproper action therefore refutes both conclusions, without using any choice principle.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources