How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Compact Lie-group actions are proper
Statement
Every continuous action of a compact Lie group on a Hausdorff locally compact manifold is proper: its action-graph map has compact inverse images of compact sets. In particular, every smooth action of a compact Lie group is proper in the sense of Free and proper Lie-group actions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A compact Lie group , a Hausdorff locally compact manifold , and a continuous action .
The action is proper exactly when , , has compact inverse images of compact subsets. Free and proper Lie-group actions.
Finite products of compact spaces are compact. A product of finitely many compact spaces is compact in the product topology.
A compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed, and a closed subset of a compact space is compact. In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones, A closed subspace of a compact space is compact, and a finite union of compact subspaces is compact.
A finite product of Hausdorff spaces is Hausdorff. Arbitrary products preserve , , and Hausdorffness.
Proof
Let be compact and let . The projection is continuous, so is compact by [F2].
Since both coordinates of every satisfy , its second coordinate lies in . Hence , and is compact by [F3].
The manifold is Hausdorff by hypothesis, so is Hausdorff by [F5]. Thus is closed by [F4]. The map is continuous because the action and the second projection are continuous, so is closed in , and therefore also closed in the subspace .
By [F4], the closed subset of the compact space is compact. Since was arbitrary, [F1] proves properness. Local compactness of is part of the stated manifold context but is not needed in this compact-domain argument; no freeness or choice principle is used.
Depends on
- Free and proper Lie-group actions
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
- Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space
- Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not
- A product of finitely many compact spaces is compact in the product topology
- In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones
- A closed subspace of a compact space is compact, and a finite union of compact subspaces is compact
- A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism
- Arbitrary products preserve $T_0$, $T_1$, and Hausdorffness
Used by
- A proper nonfree action is not a principal bundle Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)