How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The canonical principal-bundle candidate G to G/H
Definition
Assume , let be a closed subgroup of a finite-dimensional real Lie group , and give the quotient manifold structure of Quotient manifold by a closed Lie subgroup. The map
together with the smooth right action
is the canonical principal--bundle candidate over .
The action is free, and its orbits are precisely the fibres of : exactly when for a unique . A smooth principal trivialization over means a diffeomorphism over
that is -equivariant for . Thus, if , then . This is the smooth version of the right-principal convention in Principal g bundle and associated fiber bundle and of the local-trivialization convention in Smooth fibre bundles and local trivializations. The next theorem proves that such charts cover ; their existence is not built into this definition. Countable choice is used only to supply the quotient manifold.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)