How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Positive-parameter normalized time and spatial ends
Statement
Use the same family, including the contraction , and let . The exact coordinate change gives The constants and a common end radius may be chosen uniformly on for any fixed . No uniform normalized end at is asserted. Since is bounded above and away from zero, has the scale (meaning that its coefficient relative to is bounded above and below by positive constants). A fixed normalized radius corresponds to original radius , which tends to infinity as .
Facts & Assumptions
Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity defines fixed-chart differentiated bounds and parameter uniformity. Mass-one Ernst decay and uniform Harrison denominator bounds gives the denominator expansion, the pole constant bounds and the mass-one potential and metric estimates.
The differentiated spatial decay supplied by the Harrison lift and Uniform spatial components and the cylinder scale give the spatial one-form and metric estimates.
Stationary Harrison one-form and metric gives the tensor and the contraction condition; Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator fixes the pole-evaluation normalization. The time coordinate is normalized using that same , not an independently chosen constant.
Proof
**Given:**The fixed-parameter family with the normalized contraction.
Goal: Establish the exact time scaling and differentiated normalized end estimates.
In the original chart put and . Expanding the Harrison tensor gives and . This is also obtained from the pullback formula and . For , [F1] yields and , with constants depending on . Hence and . The spatial block is by [F2].
The coordinate vector factors are and . Insert these into the three blocks from step 1.1. The leading temporal and spatial coefficients become and . A derivative of order in gives times the original spatial derivative, and ; thus a remainder of order becomes before the block's constant coordinate factors. All these factors are controlled on . This proves the stated estimates. The scale statement follows from the bounds in [F1], and the radius identity follows directly from . Neither computation permits putting into these coordinates.
Depends on
- Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
- Mass-one Ernst decay and uniform Harrison denominator bounds
- The differentiated spatial decay supplied by the Harrison lift
- Uniform spatial components and the cylinder scale
- Stationary Harrison one-form and metric
- Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator
Used by · 1
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.