Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Positive-parameter normalized time and spatial ends

Statement

Use the same family, including the contraction Wq(T)=dq−Dq, and let q>0. The exact coordinate change tq=dq4qt,xq=qx,rq=qr gives (gq)tqtq=−1+O5(rq−1),(gq)tqxqi=O5(rq−2),(gq)xqixqj=δij+O5(rq−1). The constants and a common end radius may be chosen uniformly on q∈[δ,1] for any fixed δ>0. No uniform normalized end at q=0 is asserted. Since dq is bounded above and away from zero, tq has the scale t/q (meaning that its coefficient relative to t/q is bounded above and below by positive constants). A fixed normalized radius rq=R corresponds to original radius r=R/q, which tends to infinity as q↓0.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity defines fixed-chart differentiated bounds and parameter uniformity. Mass-one Ernst decay and uniform Harrison denominator bounds gives the denominator expansion, the pole constant bounds and the mass-one potential and metric estimates.

[F3]

Stationary Harrison one-form and metric gives the tensor and the contraction condition; Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator fixes the pole-evaluation normalization. The time coordinate is normalized using that same dq, not an independently chosen constant.

Proof

**Given:**The fixed-parameter family with the normalized contraction.

Goal: Establish the exact time scaling and differentiated normalized end estimates.

1.1F1F2F3givenalgebra

In the original chart put ai=g0i and Wt=dq−Dq. Expanding the Harrison tensor gives gq(T,T)=dq2g00/(4Dq) and (gq)0i=dq4Dq(Dqai−f(Wq)i). This is also obtained from the pullback formula and AqT=(dq/Dq)T. For q∈[δ,1], [F1] yields Dq=4q2+O5(r−1) and Dq−1=(4q2)−1+O5(r−1), with constants depending on δ. Hence (gq)00=−(dq/(4q))2+O5(r−1) and (gq)0i=O5(r−2). The spatial block is q2δij+O5(r−1) by [F2].

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

The coordinate vector factors are ∂tq=(4q/dq)∂t and ∂xqi=q−1∂xi. Insert these into the three blocks from step 1.1. The leading temporal and spatial coefficients become −1 and δij. A derivative of order k in xq gives q−k times the original spatial derivative, and r=rq/q; thus a remainder of order r−b−k becomes qbrq−b−k before the block's constant coordinate factors. All these factors are controlled on [δ,1]. This proves the stated O5 estimates. The scale statement follows from the dq bounds in [F1], and the radius identity follows directly from rq=qr. Neither computation permits putting q=0 into these coordinates.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.