Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Mass-one Ernst decay and uniform Harrison denominator bounds

Statement

In the stationary end notation of the declared definitions, assume T=∂t, r=∣x∣>R0, and g00=−1+2/r+O6(r−2),g0i=O6(r−2),gij=δij+O6(r−1). Suppose the normalized Ernst potential σ=f+iψ, f=−g(T,T), is supplied on an open set U⊆M containing the designated end, with ψ→0 on that end and the differential equation of the Ernst definition on U. Thus f=−g00 on the end. Then ψ=O6(r−2) and σ=1−2/r+O6(r−2). For q∈[0,1] put sq=q+r−1 and Dq=∣1+q−(1−q)σ∣2. Uniformly for q∈[0,1] on one sufficiently large exterior region, Dq=4sq2(1+εq),εq=O5(r−1),csq2≤Dq≤Csq2 for some positive constants c,C. For every multi-index β with ∣β∣≤5, ∣∂βsq−1∣≤Cβsq−1r−∣β∣. If S is the supplied bifurcation surface of the Harrison normalization and the chosen pole p∈S∩U satisfies T(p)=0, then dq=Dq(p)=(1+q)2+(1−q)2ψ(p)2 lies between 1 and 4+ψ(p)2.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The differentiated fixed-chart notation and meaning of parameter uniformity are Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity. The end, its stationary Killing field and its coefficient conventions are Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime. Here the mass coefficient is explicitly one.

[F2]

Killing two-form and normalized Ernst notation defines F=12dT♭, f=−g(T,T) and the conditional potential, with ∂iψ=TbϵbiμνFμν and the metric-dependent index raising and orientation.

[F3]

Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator defines Dq and dq by the supplied normalized potential and the supplied pole; it does not assert their positivity.

[F4]

On an open Euclidean domain, a real matrix with C6 entries and nowhere-zero determinant has a C6 inverse. Matrix inversion preserves Cᵏ regularity where the determinant is nonzero This applies to the Lorentzian metric matrix on the end and, after increasing its radius, to the spatial block, which tends to the identity.

[F5]

The scalar product, quotient and chain rules apply to differentiable functions where denominators do not vanish. Sum, product, quotient, and chain rules from difference quotients The total chain rule applies to composable differentiable Euclidean maps. The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘ Df(a) We use the scalar rules successively along coordinate lines, and the total chain rule for the smooth radial restriction of ψ.

[F6]

For a C1 real function on an open interval containing finite endpoints a,b, the integral of its derivative from a to b equals its endpoint difference. The fundamental theorem of calculus and integration by parts We apply this on finite radial intervals; the limit at infinity is justified in the proof by the decay bound and the supplied normalization.

Proof

Given: The stated stationary metric, the normalized potential on the supplied open set U, and, for the final assertion, the supplied pole p∈S∩U.

Goal: Derive the end bounds with one radius and constants independent of q.

1.1F1F2F4F5F6givenalgebra

The metric matrix tends to the Minkowski matrix, with determinant tending to −1, while its spatial block tends to the identity. Apply [F4] also to the identity matrix-valued map on the open set of invertible matrices: inversion is continuous at both limiting matrices, so the inverses are bounded on a sufficiently large end. Their entries as functions of the end coordinates are C6 by [F4]. Differentiating g−1g=I repeatedly, with the finite product rule, gives gij=δij+O6(r−1), g00=−1+O6(r−1), and g0i=O6(r−2). For the last bound use the block identity g0i=−g00g0j(gsp−1)ji; its derivatives have the same order. The volume coefficient is bounded with its corresponding differentiated bounds. Stationarity and [F2] give Fij=12(∂ig0j−∂jg0i)=O5(r−3) and F0i=−12∂ig00=O5(r−2). In ϵ0iμνFμν the indices μ,ν are spatial; every F0a contribution to the raised spatial components contains a mixed inverse coefficient gj0=O6(r−2). The remaining terms are O5(r−3). Thus ∂iψ=O5(r−3). For a fixed unit vector ω, the smooth real function h(ρ)=ψ(ρω) on (R0,∞) has derivative h′(ρ)=ωi∂iψ(ρω) by [F5]. For finite R>r, [F6] gives ψ(Rω)−ψ(rω)=∫rRωi∂iψ(ρω) dρ. The integrand is bounded in modulus by Cρ−3 uniformly in ω, and its tail integral from R to any R′>R is at most C/(2R2). Hence this integral converges as R→∞; using ψ(Rω)→0 gives ψ(rω)=−∫r∞ωi∂iψ(ρω) dρ=O(r−2) uniformly in direction. For derivatives of order one through six use the already obtained five derivative bounds on the gradient. This proves the two potential estimates.

2.1F1F3F5step 1.1algebra

Spatial derivatives of r−1 of order k are bounded by Ckr−1−k. Since sq≥r−1, they are bounded by Cksqr−k. Induction using derivatives of sqsq−1=1 yields the stated inverse bound; the same reasoning gives ∣∂βsq−2∣≤Cβsq−2r−∣β∣. All constants are independent of q. In particular q/sq and r−1/sq, together with derivatives of order k≤5, are O(r−k) uniformly. Write σ=1−2/r+e with e=O6(r−2). Then 1+q−(1−q)σ2sq=1−qsqr−(1−q)e2sq=1+aq,aq=O5(r−1). This follows by the preceding inverse bounds and sq−1≤r, with finite product differentiation. Hence Dq/(4sq2)=∣1+aq∣2=1+O5(r−1). Enlarge the common radius so this last error has absolute value below one half; its reciprocal also has uniform differentiated bounds by repeated differentiation of its product with its inverse. This proves both inequalities.

3.1F2F3givenalgebra∎

The supplied pole lies in U, so the same smooth potential can be evaluated there. Since T(p)=0, f(p)=−g(T(p),T(p))=0, so σ(p)=iψ(p). Taking the squared modulus gives the asserted exact expression for dq. For 0≤q≤1, its first term is between one and four and its second term is between zero and ψ(p)2. These are finite positive bounds independent of q.

Depends on

Used by · 5

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.