How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Differentiated stationary end bounds imply the weighted Hölder interface
Statement
Fix a stationary chart with on , metric components , , , and Minkowski matrix . Here the asymptotic coefficient of means the constant in an expansion with . Then after increasing , , , is uniformly timelike and its asymptotic coefficient is . Moreover for any , every order- coordinate derivative of a metric component satisfies when and , where . These are the local quantitative end inequalities; end gluing and global causality remain separate conditions.
Facts & Assumptions
Stationary fields, charts and metric components have the specified geometric meanings. Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions
Differentiated decay controls Cartesian derivatives uniformly in angle. Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
If is continuous on , differentiable on , , and there for a finite , then . The mean value inequality: if f : [a,b] → ℝᵐ is continuous and differentiable on (a,b) with ‖ f'‖₂ ≤ M, then ‖ f(b)-f(a)‖₂ ≤ M(b-a)
Proof
Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.
Goal: Establish the stated quantitative end inequalities and coefficient.
Fix a common radius beyond which the differentiated decay bounds hold, and increase the final so that and every component of has absolute value at most for . Then and . Thus . Since , its squared norm is , so it is uniformly timelike.
The local flow of translates and fixes . Its preservation of makes the metric components independent of ; hence derivatives containing a time derivative vanish, and purely spatial derivatives are independent of . The identity gives the defined expansion with and . In any such expansion, its time component gives ; since , the right side tends to zero as , so the constant is uniquely .
Let be a purely spatial order- derivative of a metric component. Join to by changing their three coordinates one at a time. Every point on these coordinate segments satisfies , so . The next differentiated bound gives on all three segments. On each nondegenerate coordinate interval the restriction of is , and its one-variable derivative is the corresponding partial derivative. Apply [F3] on that interval; zero-length intervals contribute zero. Telescoping the three differences yields .
If , then for one has , and the preceding bound is at most . For the difference is zero. Purely spatial derivatives have no time dependence, and derivatives containing a time derivative are zero. Adding the nonnegative term therefore gives the claimed estimate for every order- coordinate derivative when .
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.