How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The stationary maximal vacuum divergence identity with the article sign
Statement
On a smooth maximal spacelike hypersurface in a vacuum spacetime (here meaning ), decompose the stationary Killing field as , use , and write for the Levi–Civita connection of the induced Riemannian metric . Spatial indices range from to , and are raised and lowered with . Then Here . These are conditional local identities on an already supplied maximal hypersurface; they do not construct it.
Statement references
Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data
Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions
Gradient hessian and divergence connection formulas
Killing fields and conserved currents, and on-shell conservation of the Hilbert stress-energy tensor
Product connection on tensor and hom bundles
Induced connections commute with contraction and permutation
The Riemann curvature operator and the derived Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors
Facts & Assumptions
The hypersurface data fix , maximality , and the stationary data fix the ambient metric-compatible connection and the local-flow Killing condition. Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions
For this Lorentzian ambient metric, Proof 1.1 of the constraint supplier proves , hence for tangent fields. Its Statement (c) gives , where is symmetric. Gauss-Codazzi decomposition in Gaussian normal coordinates and the constraint equations in terms of the induced metric and second fundamental form
Clause (a) characterizes by the covariant Killing equation . Its smooth oriented time-oriented Lorentzian four-dimensional hypotheses are supplied by the stationary data. Killing fields and conserved currents, and on-shell conservation of the Hilbert stress-energy tensor Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions
On and its dual use the product tensor connection induced by . It differentiates tensor products by the Leibniz rule and commutes with contractions and permutations. Since is -compatible, ; differentiating with these rules also gives . Product connection on tensor and hom bundles Induced connections commute with contraction and permutation Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data
For the Riemannian metric , the divergence of a smooth vector field is the trace . Gradient hessian and divergence connection formulas
The scalar curvature is and the Einstein tensor is . These are geometric tensor definitions, independent of a physical field-equation postulate. The Riemann curvature operator and the derived Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors
Proof
Given: The smooth stationary Lorentzian data, the supplied maximal spacelike hypersurface, and the geometric vacuum hypothesis , with the conventions and interfaces in [F1]–[F6].
Goal: Derive the three local identities with the displayed sign.
Apply the tangential projection identity in [F2] to the tangent shift . It gives for tangent . Metric compatibility and the dual/product connection in [F4] identify the right side in components with . The projection identity is valid for a spacelike hypersurface in a Lorentzian manifold; no Riemannian ambient-metric hypothesis is used.
The hypothesis implies and by [F6]. In [F2], and maximality give , so its mixed normal projection yields . Hence . Raising and commuting the inverse metric with using [F4] gives exactly .
By [F3], . Substitute . The terms and vanish by normal orthogonality, and the two normal-derivative terms sum to , using the symmetry in [F2]. Step 1.1 converts the remaining terms to . Thus .
Set . By [F5] its divergence is . The tensor product and contraction rules of [F4] give . Step 1.2 eliminates the first term. Symmetry of and step 2.1 give . This proves the final identity. Reversing the second fundamental form convention reverses the displayed divergence sign but leaves its zero-integral implication unchanged.
Depends on
- Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data
- Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions
- Gauss-Codazzi decomposition in Gaussian normal coordinates and the constraint equations in terms of the induced metric and second fundamental form
- Gradient hessian and divergence connection formulas
- Killing fields and conserved currents, and on-shell conservation of the Hilbert stress-energy tensor
- Product connection on tensor and hom bundles
- Induced connections commute with contraction and permutation
- The Riemann curvature operator and the derived Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.