Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A supplied complete maximal slice has zero extrinsic curvature in the zero-shift case

Statement

Suppose a connected smooth complete-up-to-boundary maximal hypersurface Σ‾ with nonempty compact smooth boundary S and one asymptotically Euclidean end has already been supplied in the stationary vacuum spacetime. Assume T∣S=0, its lapse tends uniformly to one, and in an end chart h−δ=O2(r−1), k=O(r−2log⁡r) and X=O(r−1log⁡r), with tensor norms measured by h or the uniformly equivalent Cartesian metric. Then the lapse satisfies N>0 inside and has positive inward normal derivative at S, and k=0 everywhere on this hypersurface. These are consequences of the supplied slice, not a replacement for its existence and end estimates.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Work in the inherited ZFC convention, including the Axiom of Choice. Applying a choice function to the family of values of any countable family of nonempty sets and composing with its indexing gives countable choice. This supplies the choice hypothesis of the divergence theorem used in step 2.2, as well as the choice conventions of the other suppliers. Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

The stationary data supply an oriented smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold and a smooth Killing field T; vacuum here is the geometric hypothesis Ric⁡(g)=0. The supplied spacelike hypersurface has smooth future unit normal n, induced metric h, symmetric second fundamental form k(U,V)=−g(∇Un,V), and maximality tr⁡hk=0. Its lapse and shift are N=−g(T,n) and X=T−Nn. Complete up to the compact boundary uses the intrinsic distance with the boundary included. Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data

[F2]

Use the smooth exterior convention: a compact core and a fixed chart onto {x∈R3:∣x∣>r0}, with r=∣x∣, and Δh=div⁡hgrad⁡h. The end limit is uniform in this chart. Here h−δ=O2(r−1) means that each Cartesian component and its coordinate derivatives of orders j=0,1,2 are O(r−1−j). The displayed O bounds for k and X are pointwise norm bounds. Weighted exterior elliptic domains and admissible weights

[F3]

On a supplied maximal hypersurface the Killing lapse satisfies ΔhN=(∣k∣h2+Ric⁡(n,n))N. On a connected smooth Riemannian exterior, a smooth solution of (Δh−V)u=0 with smooth V≥0, zero compact boundary values, and uniform positive end limit is positive inside and has strictly positive inward unit normal derivative at the boundary. Mean-curvature variation and the stationary lapse equation Exterior Schrödinger maximum principles, Hopf growth and Harnack

[F4]

With these vacuum and maximal conventions, the smooth tangent field Yi=kijXj satisfies div⁡hY=N∣k∣h2. The stationary maximal vacuum divergence identity with the article sign

[F5]

A coorienting normal ray on a hypersurface in an oriented manifold induces its orientation by the normal-first rule. On an oriented Riemannian manifold with smooth boundary, countable choice permits the divergence theorem for smooth compactly supported vector fields, with outward unit normal and outward-normal-first boundary orientation; on a compact manifold every smooth field is compactly supported. Orientation induced on a hypersurface by a coorientation Riemannian divergence theorem

[F6]

For finite real lists (aj) and (bj), (∑jajbj)2≤(∑jaj2)(∑jbj2). The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for finite sums

Proof

Given: The conditional slice, geometric vacuum and end hypotheses of the Statement, with [A1] and [F1]–[F6].

Goal: Prove the stated lapse properties and the vanishing of k.

1.1givenF1

At S, T=0 gives N=−g(T,n)=0 and then X=T−Nn=0 directly. The smooth normal and orthogonal decomposition extend to the boundary by the supplied smooth spacelike boundary data. No null sheets are needed for these pointwise conclusions.

1.2givenF1F2F5

Orient Σ‾ by the smooth future normal n: a tangent basis (v1,v2,v3) is positive precisely when (n,v1,v2,v3) is positive in the oriented ambient spacetime. Since n is everywhere transverse, this is a smooth orientation, including at S. For sufficiently large R, remove the open tail {r>R} to obtain the compact smooth truncation ΩR with boundary S⊔SR, where SR={r=R}. Compactness follows from the compact-core exterior convention; the end chart makes SR a smooth boundary disjoint from S. Restrict the induced orientation to ΩR and give its boundary the outward-normal-first orientation.

2.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1

By [F3] and the geometric vacuum hypothesis, ΔhN=∣k∣h2N. The potential ∣k∣h2 is smooth and nonnegative. The exterior is connected with smooth compact boundary, N is smooth up to that boundary, step 1.1 supplies its zero boundary values, and its uniform end limit is one. Thus the exterior maximum and boundary-control result gives N>0 inside and a strictly positive inward unit normal derivative at every point of S.

2.2givenA1F1F2F4F5F6step 1.1step 1.2

The field Y in [F4] is smooth on compact ΩR, so the divergence theorem applies there with countable choice supplied by [A1]. If νR is its outward unit normal on SR, the identity becomes ∫ΩRN∣k∣h2 dμh=∫SRh(Y,νR) dAh, since X=0 makes the flux on S zero. In an h-orthonormal frame, apply [F6] to each row of (kij) and the components of X, then sum: ∣Y∣h2=∑i(∑jkijXj)2≤(∑i,jkij2)(∑jXj2)=∣k∣h2∣X∣h2. Taking nonnegative square roots gives ∣Y∣h≤∣k∣h∣X∣h. The bound h−δ=O(r−1) makes h uniformly equivalent to the Cartesian metric for large r, and its restriction to SR therefore gives Area⁡h(SR)≤CR2. The end estimates yield ∣∫SRh(Y,νR) dAh∣≤CR2R−2log⁡R R−1log⁡R=CR−1(log⁡R)2→0.

3.1F1step 2.1step 1.2step 2.2∎

The integrand N∣k∣h2 is continuous and nonnegative by step 2.1. The compact truncations are nested and exhaust the hypersurface. For any fixed sufficiently large R0 and all R≥R0, 0≤∫ΩR0N∣k∣h2 dμh≤∫ΩRN∣k∣h2 dμh, and the right side tends to zero by step 2.2. Every such fixed integral is therefore zero. A positive value of the integrand at an interior point would, by continuity and positivity of the Riemannian volume density, give a positive integral on a small coordinate neighborhood, a contradiction. Hence N∣k∣h2=0 throughout the interior; its strictly positive lapse factor forces k=0 there. Smoothness up to S then gives k=0 on the boundary as well.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.