How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Vanishing divergence implies closed Hodge dual
Statement
For the stationary Lorentzian data and a smooth real two-form , implies . Thus the word co-closed here means precisely the vanishing-divergence condition, equivalently the displayed Hodge-closure equation.
Facts & Assumptions
Use the metric connection and index conventions of Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions.
The real Hodge star and its complex extension are those of Complex self-dual forms and metric-dependent contraction.
The Hodge formula is , and exterior differentiation is alternating differentiation. Lorentzian exterior calculus and Hodge star
At each point one may choose coordinates with and first metric derivatives zero. Point-normal and exponential coordinate charts of the metric-selected connection
In a positively oriented chart the metric volume form is ; its component array is the positive density times the alternating symbol. The metric volume form, current flux through 3-faces and finite-chain charges
Proof
Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.
Goal: Prove all asserted identities under these hypotheses.
Fix a point and use [F4], making the chart positively oriented by reversing one spatial coordinate if necessary. The Christoffel symbols and first metric derivatives vanish at . Write for the metric volume form of [F5]. Its components are times the alternating symbol. Since the determinant is a polynomial in the metric entries and the square-root function is smooth at , the vanishing of their first derivatives gives . For distinct indices let be the missing fourth index. The Hodge formula gives , with no sum over , since the two complementary terms in the half-sum agree.
At , cyclically adding derivatives and using gives for distinct , with only summed in the last expression; the missing term is zero by antisymmetry. Put . Metric compatibility gives , with summed. Thus vanishing divergence implies , and the displayed identity makes every distinct-index component of zero. Repeated-index components vanish by alternation. Since was arbitrary, globally.
Conversely, suppose . For each at , choose the other three indices as . The identity in step 2.1 gives , with no summation here. By [F5] and the normal metric at , , so for each . Lowering the free index in using the nondegenerate metric yields , with the contracted indices summed. The point was arbitrary, proving the converse globally and hence the asserted equivalence.
Depends on
- Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions
- Complex self-dual forms and metric-dependent contraction
- Lorentzian exterior calculus and Hodge star
- Point-normal and exponential coordinate charts of the metric-selected connection
- The metric volume form, current flux through 3-faces and finite-chain charges
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.