Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Closed Ernst contraction and the real potential

Statement

For Ricci-flat stationary Lorentzian data, put Fab=∇aTb, F=F+i⋆gF, and η=2ιTF, where (ιTF)b=TaFab. Then dη=0 and Re⁡η=d(−g(T,T)). There are smooth complex potentials locally. On an open set where η=dσ, Re⁡σ=−g(T,T) up to one real constant on each connected component.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The fields, metric connection, and scalar f=−g(T,T) are defined in Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions.

[F2]

Use F=F+i⋆gF with complex-linear Hodge star. Complex self-dual forms and metric-dependent contraction

[F3]

The real Killing two-form satisfies dF=0. The Killing derivative is an exact closed two-form

[F4]

Ricci flatness implies ∇aFab=0. Ricci contraction of the Killing derivative

[F5]

Vanishing divergence of a two-form implies closedness of its Hodge dual. Vanishing divergence implies closed Hodge dual

[F6]

The complex Killing two-form satisfies LTF=0. Killing flow preserves its complex two-form

[F7]

The Cartan identity is LTω=dιTω+ιTdω, and is extended complex linearly. Cartan's magic formula

[F8]

Every closed smooth real one-form on a star-shaped coordinate domain has a potential by the Poincare lemma. Poincare's lemma on a star-shaped domain: every closed C1 field is exact

[F9]

Use real exterior differentiation defined by the invariant vector-field formula. For a complex form written in its unique real and imaginary parts as U+iV, define d(U+iV)=dU+i dV and ιT(U+iV)=ιTU+iιTV, including degree zero for d. These are componentwise extensions, with T real. The exterior derivative by the invariant vector-field formula

[F10]

On a smooth real function h, exterior differentiation is the ordinary differential: dh(X)=Xh. The exterior derivative of a function is its differential

Proof

Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.

Goal: Prove all asserted identities under these hypotheses.

1.1F1F2F3F4F5F6F7F9F10algebra

Each term in the invariant formula [F9] is real-linear in the form, so d(aU+bV)=a dU+b dV for real constants a,b. Consequently the componentwise extension in [F9] is complex-linear and commutes with taking real and imaginary parts. Applying the real Cartan identity separately to those parts gives [F7] for complex forms. By [F3]–[F5], dF=dF+i d⋆gF=0. Applying [F7] and then [F6] gives dη=2(LTF−ιTdF)=0. By [F10], metric compatibility and the antisymmetry of F give (df)b=−2Ta∇bTa=2TaFab=Re⁡ηb.

2.1step 1.1F1F8F9F10algebra∎

Restrict to a coordinate ball; its image is star-shaped. By step 1.1, both real and imaginary parts of η are closed smooth real one-forms. Evaluating the invariant formula [F9] on commuting coordinate vector fields identifies closedness of either real one-form with ∂jAk=∂kAj for its real coefficient field A. Thus their coefficient fields meet the closed C1 hypotheses of [F8], which supplies real potentials whose complex combination is a local σ. Their first partial derivatives are smooth components of η, so these potentials are smooth. Wherever a global primitive is assumed, step 1.1 and [F9]–[F10] give d(Re⁡σ−f)=0. This difference is constant on each coordinate ball by integrating its zero derivative along segments, and hence locally constant. On each connected component it is constant, since every nonempty fiber of a locally constant function is open and closed. No assertion that all periods vanish is used.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.