How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Ricci contraction of the Killing derivative
Statement
For stationary Lorentzian data, the Killing two-form obeys . In particular, if , then . The curvature and Ricci signs are those of the stationary-data definition.
Facts & Assumptions
The connection, index conventions, curvature and Ricci contraction are those of Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions.
The Killing derivative is alternating. The Killing derivative is an exact closed two-form
The curvature has the pair skew-symmetries, pair-exchange symmetry and symmetric Ricci contraction. The algebraic symmetries of the curvature tensor and the symmetry of the Ricci and Einstein tensors
Import the vector Ricci commutator with the exact convention recorded in the External input; its source is Reall (4.7)–(4.8).
Proof
Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.
Goal: Prove all asserted identities under these hypotheses.
Apply the commutator in [F4] to the scalar pairing and use the connection product rule. Scalar second derivatives commute by torsion freedom, so the covector formula is . Contracting gives : indeed , using the first-pair skew-symmetry and the stated Ricci contraction.
Alternation gives and . Metric compatibility and step 1.1 therefore yield . Under Ricci flatness the right side vanishes.
External input
The vector identity and contraction are the imported input from Reall (4.7)–(4.8). Its convention matches the stationary-data definition exactly. No sign of a curvature tensor from a different source is transferred implicitly.
Depends on
- Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions
- The Killing derivative is an exact closed two-form
- The algebraic symmetries of the curvature tensor and the symmetry of the Ricci and Einstein tensors
- H. S. Reall, General Relativity, Part III Mathematical Tripos, October 12, 2022 · Conventions, printed p. 3 (PDF p. 4); §4.2, equations (4.7)–(4.8), printed p. 42 (PDF p. 43)
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
For a torsion-free connection, $(\nabla_c\nabla_d-\nabla_d\nabla_c)Z^a=R^a{}_{bcd}Z^b$. The Ricci contraction is $R_{ab}=R^c{}_{acb}$.
Hypotheses: A smooth torsion-free connection and a smooth vector field; the curvature convention is the one explicitly stated in the cited Conventions.
Reading limits: Retrieved the PDF and read the Conventions and the §4.2 passage containing (4.7)–(4.8). Equation (4.8) is stated as an exercise with a hint; no complete source proof was read. The identity is explicitly imported here; dualization and its Killing-field application are authored locally. No full-text proof review is claimed.
Sources
- H. S. Reall, General Relativity, Part III Mathematical Tripos, October 12, 2022 · Conventions, printed p. 3 (PDF p. 4); §4.2, equations (4.7)–(4.8), printed p. 42 (PDF p. 43)