How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The asymptotic metric flux of Kerr equals its mass parameter
Statement
The ADM energy of the specified constant Kerr end exists and equals .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The following exact suppliers supply the geometric objects and earlier conclusions used here: Asymptotic mass and axial angular-momentum conventions The Boyer–Lindquist spatial end and differentiated expansion
Proof
**Given:**The ADM metric-flux convention and the differentiated expansion of [F1].
Goal: Evaluate the energy flux.
Put . Direct differentiation in dimension three gives and . Thus their difference contracted with is . The remainder of the metric contributes to this contracted integrand.
Integration over a Euclidean coordinate sphere gives . The integrated remainder is and vanishes. Division by and the limit in the definition yield .
External input
The cited Kerr coordinate formulas provide background for the local calculation in this item.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
The review gives ingoing and Boyer–Lindquist Kerr forms, their coordinate transformation, and the asymptotic identification of mass M and angular momentum J=aM.
Hypotheses: The Kerr metric in the stated coordinate systems and their indicated domains.
Reading limits: Read the cited formulas and surrounding discussion. This is background for the Kerr construction, not a proof of the full indexed statement or its normalization-specific calculations.
Sources
- The Kerr Metric · §2, equations (2.1), (2.5)–(2.8), PDF pp. 2–3