How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Boyer–Lindquist spatial end and differentiated expansion
Statement
On a constant slice of the Kerr exterior, set and . Its induced metric satisfies The lapse is and its shift one-form has Cartesian components . These are fixed-parameter bounds uniform in angular directions, with no assertion of uniformity as parameters vary.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The following exact suppliers supply the geometric objects and earlier conclusions used here: Kerr exterior tensor including the extremal parameter range Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
For a spacelike slice, the induced metric is on tangent vectors. For and its unit normal , the lapse and tangent shift are and . The shift one-form is the tangent covector . Use the time orientation with on the constant slices; their spacelikeness is verified below. These are the induced-metric and normal–tangent conventions of Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data.
Proof
Given: The exterior metric and differentiated fixed-chart convention of [F1], and the induced-metric and lapse–shift conventions of [F2].
Goal: Establish the required asymptotically flat end expansions.
The slice metric is diagonal in the polar chart: , , and . Relative to the smooth sphere metric and its rotation one-form, the last two correction terms are bounded smooth sphere tensors. Transforming their covariant components to Cartesian coordinates introduces , whereas . This gives the displayed Cartesian expansion. Smooth rational functions of and smooth angular tensors have the indicated derivative bounds; all denominators are bounded away from zero for sufficiently large . Moreover, globally on the sphere the induced metric is , where is the round metric and is its smooth rotation one-form. Since , this is positive definite everywhere on each exterior slice, including the axes. Thus the slices are spacelike and [F2] applies.
Set . Inverting the exterior block gives away from the axes; this smooth scalar formula extends across them. For the unit normal in [F2], the covector vanishes on the slice tangents and takes the value on , so . Taking its inverse-metric squared norm gives . Also , since is tangent, so the chosen orientation gives . Consequently . This is a smooth function of and smooth angular data near , with value there and denominators bounded away from zero, hence in the convention of [F1].
For every tangent vector , orthogonality gives , so in the adapted coordinates , as claimed in the Statement. The exterior tensor therefore gives . Since , its Cartesian coefficients are , smoothly across the axes. The smooth rational coefficients give the differentiated bounds by the same fixed-parameter argument as in step 1.1.
External input
The cited Kerr coordinate formulas provide background for the local calculation in this item.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
The review gives ingoing and Boyer–Lindquist Kerr forms, their coordinate transformation, and the asymptotic identification of mass M and angular momentum J=aM.
Hypotheses: The Kerr metric in the stated coordinate systems and their indicated domains.
Reading limits: Consulted section 2, equations (2.1), (2.5)–(2.8) and adjacent discussion on PDF pages 2–3. These supply coordinate and parameter background only. The differentiated end bounds and the identification of lapse and shift are derived locally using the declared mathematical suppliers; no source proof of the full indexed statement was reconstructed.
Sources
- The Kerr Metric · §2, equations (2.1), (2.5)–(2.8), PDF pp. 2–3