Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Boyer–Lindquist spatial end and differentiated expansion

Statement

On a constant t slice of the Kerr exterior, set x=r(sin⁡θcos⁡ϕ,sin⁡θsin⁡ϕ,cos⁡θ) and n=x/r. Its induced metric satisfies hij=δij+2Mrninj+O2(r−2). The lapse is N=1+O2(r−1) and its shift one-form β=gtidxi has Cartesian components O2(r−2). These are fixed-parameter bounds uniform in angular directions, with no assertion of uniformity as parameters vary.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The following exact suppliers supply the geometric objects and earlier conclusions used here: Kerr exterior tensor including the extremal parameter range Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity

[F2]

For a spacelike slice, the induced metric is h(U,V)=g(U,V) on tangent vectors. For T=∂t and its unit normal ν, the lapse and tangent shift are N=−g(T,ν) and X=T−Nν. The shift one-form is the tangent covector β=h(X,⋅). Use the time orientation with dt(ν)>0 on the constant t slices; their spacelikeness is verified below. These are the induced-metric and normal–tangent conventions of Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data.

Proof

Given: The exterior metric and differentiated fixed-chart convention of [F1], and the induced-metric and lapse–shift conventions of [F2].

Goal: Establish the required asymptotically flat end expansions.

1.1givenF1F2

The slice metric is diagonal in the polar chart: hrr=Σ/Δ=1+2M/r+O(r−2), hθθ=r2+a2cos⁡2θ, and hϕϕ=(r2+a2+2Ma2rsin⁡2θ/Σ)sin⁡2θ. Relative to the smooth sphere metric and its rotation one-form, the last two correction terms are bounded smooth sphere tensors. Transforming their covariant components to Cartesian coordinates introduces r−2, whereas dr=nidxi. This gives the displayed Cartesian expansion. Smooth rational functions of 1/r and smooth angular tensors have the indicated derivative bounds; all denominators are bounded away from zero for sufficiently large r. Moreover, globally on the sphere the induced metric is h=(Σ/Δ)dr2+Σγ+a2(1+2Mr/Σ)α⊗α, where γ is the round metric and α=sin⁡2θ dϕ is its smooth rotation one-form. Since Δ,Σ,r,M>0, this is positive definite everywhere on each exterior slice, including the axes. Thus the slices are spacelike and [F2] applies.

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1

Set D=(r2+a2)2−a2Δsin⁡2θ=(r2+a2)Σ+2Ma2rsin⁡2θ>0. Inverting the exterior t,ϕ block gives gtt=−D/(ΣΔ)<0 away from the axes; this smooth scalar formula extends across them. For the unit normal in [F2], the covector g(ν,⋅) vanishes on the slice tangents and takes the value −N on T, so g(ν,⋅)=−N dt. Taking its inverse-metric squared norm gives −1=N2gtt. Also 1=dt(T)=Ndt(ν), since X is tangent, so the chosen orientation gives N>0. Consequently N=(−gtt)−1/2=(ΣΔ/D)1/2. This is a smooth function of 1/r and smooth angular data near 1/r=0, with value 1 there and denominators bounded away from zero, hence N=1+O2(r−1) in the convention of [F1].

3.1givenF1F2step 1.1step 2.1∎

For every tangent vector U, orthogonality gives β(U)=h(X,U)=g(T,U), so in the adapted coordinates βi=gti, as claimed in the Statement. The exterior tensor therefore gives β=−2Marsin⁡2θ dϕ/Σ. Since sin⁡2θ dϕ=(−x2dx1+x1dx2)/r2, its Cartesian coefficients are O2(r−2), smoothly across the axes. The smooth rational coefficients give the differentiated bounds by the same fixed-parameter argument as in step 1.1.

External input

The cited Kerr coordinate formulas provide background for the local calculation in this item.

Depends on

Used by · 4

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

The Kerr Metric · §2, equations (2.1), (2.5)–(2.8), PDF pp. 2–3

The review gives ingoing and Boyer–Lindquist Kerr forms, their coordinate transformation, and the asymptotic identification of mass M and angular momentum J=aM.

Hypotheses: The Kerr metric in the stated coordinate systems and their indicated domains.

Reading limits: Consulted section 2, equations (2.1), (2.5)–(2.8) and adjacent discussion on PDF pages 2–3. These supply coordinate and parameter background only. The differentiated end bounds and the identification of lapse and shift are derived locally using the declared mathematical suppliers; no source proof of the full indexed statement was reconstructed.

Sources