How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Smooth rotating degenerate-horizon uniqueness
PDF p. 5: §1.3, end of first paragraph
Open problem
The article asks whether uniqueness holds for a smooth, stationary, asymptotically flat vacuum black hole with a connected rotating degenerate horizon without assuming analyticity. The intended uniqueness conclusion is that its domain of outer communications is isometric to an extremal Kerr exterior, under suitable regularity hypotheses.
One precise subcase is the following. Let be a smooth, time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold with and a stationary Killing field , and assume it is -regular relative to a specified asymptotically flat spacelike end in the sense of Staticity, axisymmetry and black-hole regularity hypotheses. In particular, is complete, the domain of outer communications is globally hyperbolic, and the specified spacelike section has the end, boundary and horizon-generator properties stated in that definition. Suppose the nonempty future event horizon is connected and is a smooth Killing horizon for a specified generating Killing field . Require the nonzero-generator part to be nonempty and dense in , with tangent and normal to on . It is rotating relative to when fails somewhere to lie in the horizon's null normal line; it is degenerate when the surface-gravity function of vanishes on its nonzero-generator part, as in Rotation, surface gravity and horizon degeneracy. Must be isometric to an extremal Kerr exterior from Kerr metric, parameters, exterior and extremality, with and ?
This subcase explicitly assumes a smooth horizon-generating Killing field. The broader article question also asks for a treatment without assuming such a field merely as a consequence of smooth stationarity; neither its existence nor global axisymmetry is asserted here.
Status
The article dated 12 November 2026 presents the smooth, non-analytic rotating degenerate case as a question. Its §1.3 describes analytic rigidity and axisymmetric extremal uniqueness as partial results, with their own hypotheses. In particular, Chruściel–Nguyen's abstract states an analytic electrovacuum result for a connected rotating degenerate horizon; analyticity is an explicit hypothesis of that result. These comparisons do not answer the question above. The status recorded here is the article-date status, not a claim that a complete later literature search has ruled out a resolution.
Depends on
- Rotation, surface gravity and horizon degeneracy
- Staticity, axisymmetry and black-hole regularity hypotheses
- Kerr metric, parameters, exterior and extremality
- Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model
- Killing fields of a Lorentzian metric
- The Riemann curvature operator and the derived Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors
- A uniqueness theorem for degenerate Kerr-Newman black holes · Abstract
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
The abstract states a Kerr–Newman uniqueness result for domains of dependence of stationary, I-plus-regular, analytic electrovacuum spacetimes with a connected, nonempty, rotating, degenerate event horizon.
Hypotheses: Stationarity, I-plus-regularity, analyticity, electrovacuum equations and a connected, nonempty, rotating, degenerate event horizon, as stated in the abstract.
Reading limits: Read the arXiv abstract only; the theorem's full technical formulation and proof were not checked. This is contextual status information, not a premise for a deduction here.
Sources
- The uniqueness of smooth stationary black holes · PDF p. 5, §1.3, first paragraph
- A uniqueness theorem for degenerate Kerr-Newman black holes · Abstract