Alphabeta Math
Open problemQuestion: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicable
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth stationary multiple-black-hole nonexistence

PDF p. 5: §1.3, last paragraph

Open problem

Can there be stationary Lorentzian data (M,g,N,T) with a specified asymptotically flat spacelike end, satisfying Ric⁡(g)=0 and I+-regularity relative to that end, whose future event horizon has more than one connected component?

Here stationary Lorentzian data mean the smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold and Killing field of Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions; the vacuum equation says that its Ricci tensor vanishes. Use the asymptotically flat end and I+-regularity conditions of Staticity, axisymmetry and black-hole regularity hypotheses. In particular, the latter specifies the complete stationary flow, globally hyperbolic exterior and an appropriate acausal spacelike section. The future event horizon is the set E+=∂MD∩IM+(Mext) in that definition, where Mext is the flow saturation of the chosen end and D=IM+(Mext)∩IM−(Mext). Multiple black holes means more than one connected component of this horizon. Neither analyticity nor a Killing-horizon generator, bifurcation surface, or nondegeneracy is assumed in the question.

Status

The article poses this as an open question in §1.3, dated 12 November 2026. It reports exclusion in the analytic vacuum setting. As a restricted smooth partial result, Wong and Yu report at most one horizon component under their additional geometric and quantitative near–Kerr–Newman assumptions, in electrovacuum and without assumed axial symmetry. Their introduction also states that the single-horizon assumption in the perturbative theorem of Alexakis, Ionescu and Klainerman can thereby be removed. These reports do not resolve the unrestricted smooth question stated above. No later status survey or independent proof review is claimed.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

Non-existence of multiple-black-hole solutions close to Kerr-Newman · Abstract, §1.2 and §2.2, Main Theorem

Under the paper's geometric assumptions and quantitative smallness condition, a stationary asymptotically flat electrovacuum solution has at most one event-horizon component, without assuming axial symmetry. The paper also describes removal of the single-horizon assumption from the perturbative uniqueness theorem of Alexakis, Ionescu and Klainerman.

Hypotheses: The source's specified nondegenerate bifurcate horizon, asymptotic and geometric assumptions, together with its Kerr–Newman characterization-tensor smallness condition. These are additional restrictions, not consequences of the open problem's hypotheses.

Reading limits: Read the abstract, introduction, and nearby definitions in the online PDF; the proof was not reviewed. The present item records the partial result as source-reported context and does not import it as a logical premise.

Sources