Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Theorem 4.2: charged horizon area lower bound

PDF p. 26: Theorem 4.2 and proof; PDF p. 27: Theorem 4.2 and proof

Statement

Assume the regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum model, with its original exterior section spacelike and maximal, ADM mass normalized to one, and stationary Killing field T not identically zero on the bifurcation sphere S. Use the single stationary primitive and Harrison fields gq,Fq supplied by the global Harrison construction. Work in ZFC. For all sufficiently small q>0,

∣S∣gq≥4π(1−q2).

Here ∣S∣gq=∫Sdμq, where dμq is the area form of the induced metric on the oriented sphere. Define the electric and magnetic flux densities by (⋆gqFq)∣TS=eq dμq and Fq∣TS=bq dμq, with the orientation inherited from outward end spheres. In the same range,

∫Seq dμq=4π1−q2,∫Sbq dμq=0.

The lower bound follows by combining these flux identities with the stability area–charge inequality.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The model, regularity, original maximal section and mass-one normalization are those in the Statement. A spacelike section has positive-definite induced metric; maximal means that its second fundamental form has zero trace. Stationary vacuum model and asymptotic normalization Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator

[A2]

Work in ZFC, including the axiom of choice. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

The global one-form construction supplies the single smooth stationary primitive used in the Harrison family under these hypotheses. Closedness, periods and smooth global choice of W0

[F2]

For each q∈(0,1], the bifurcation-stability result supplies an individually admissible smooth spacelike maximal section with boundary S. Its Statement also supplies a smooth spacelike extension agreeing with the section on its original side near S, an outward normal-graph tube of radius allowed to depend on q, and nonnegative principal eigenvalue in the future/outward gauge. Nonnegative principal eigenvalue of the horizon stability operator

[F3]

For such a section and its extension and graph tube, the stable-horizon inequality gives ∣S∣gq≥(4π)−1(∫Seq dμq)2. The horizon notation fixes the induced area form and the two flux-density identities in the Statement. Stable-horizon flux-energy and area-charge inequalities Horizon null frame, flux densities and stability operator notation

[F4]

With the mass-one stationary end expansion g00=−1+2/r+O6(r−2) established in [F8], the supplied primitive and the inherited orientation, the Harrison flux result gives (4π)−1∫S⋆gqFq=1−q2 and (4π)−1∫SFq=0 for 0≤q≤1. Proposition 2.1: electric and magnetic fluxes

[F5]

The single-primitive family is Wq=(1−q)2W0−4q(1−q)T♭. For the normalized Ernst potential σ=f+iψ, the Harrison definitions specify Bq=q(1+σ)+(1−σ), Dq=∣Bq∣2, the metric gq and the electromagnetic form Fq on their positive-denominator domain, using the same Wq, spacetime orientation and Hodge convention. The definitions require a supplied zero p of T and dq=Dq(p)>0; they do not themselves supply the primitive. Single-potential construction of the Harrison one-form family Stationary Harrison one-form and metric Harrison electromagnetic form Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator

[F6]

Under [A1], the denominator-positivity result applies to the smooth normalized Ernst data supplied by the global construction. It gives Dq>0 on the exterior and on one open neighborhood of S for q∈[0,1], with Dq≥(1+q)2 on S. Positivity of the Harrison denominator and horizon bound Closedness, periods and smooth global choice of W0

[F7]

For this same W0 and polynomial family, the regular electrovacuum result supplies the Harrison metric and real electromagnetic form on the exterior and an open neighborhood of S, where they are smooth in spacetime and satisfy the source-free Einstein–Maxwell equations. The orientations and fields are the same ones used by the flux and stability results. Proposition 2.1: Einstein–Maxwell equations and regularity

[F8]

Under the regular stationary-vacuum hypotheses, the stationary-mass lemma gives M0=mK=E, where E is the ADM energy of the original exterior section. Thus [A1]'s ADM mass-one convention gives M0=E=1, and the regular end expansion becomes g00=−1+2/r+O6(r−2); the bounds g0i=O6(r−2) and gij=δij+O6(r−1) are unchanged. Positive stationary mass from the bifurcate vacuum boundary Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator

Proof

Given: The model and construction hypotheses in the Statement.

Goal: Establish both flux identities and the area lower bound for all sufficiently small positive q.

Proof technique: direct.

1.1givenA1F1F5F6F7F8algebra

Fix q∈(0,1]. By [F8], the regular stationary-vacuum hypotheses in [A1] imply M0=mK=E. The ADM mass-one assumption gives E=1, so M0=1. Substitution into the regular end expansion yields g00=−1+2/r+O6(r−2), together with the unchanged bounds g0i=O6(r−2) and gij=δij+O6(r−1). These are the exact end conditions required by [F4]. The regular model, maximal original section, mass-one normalization and nontrivial T∣S are exactly the hypotheses of the global primitive and regular electrovacuum results. By [F1], take their single W0 and supplied pole p∈S with Tp=0, and use the family in [F5]. The positivity conclusion [F6] applies to the supplied smooth normalized Ernst potential. At the pole, f(p)=0 and hence dq=(1+q)2+(1−q)2ψ(p)2>0; also Dq=∣Bq∣2>0 makes Bq≠0. Thus the parameter, pole and denominator conditions of both Harrison field definitions hold on the exterior and a neighborhood of S. The regular realization [F7] gives these same gq,Fq smoothly through S, with the prescribed orientation.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1

Apply [F4] using the exact mass-one stationary end expansion established in step 1.1, and the same primitive and inherited orientation. Restricting its two form identities to S and using the density definitions in [F3] gives ∫Seq dμq=4π1−q2 and ∫Sbq dμq=0. The section and boundary data needed for the horizon notation are supplied by [F2] and step 1.1.

3.1givenF2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The Statement of [F2] supplies an individually admissible section, its smooth spacelike extension across S, its outward normal-graph tube and its outward stability, for the same fixed positive q. Together with step 1.1 these satisfy the section, smooth-field and graph hypotheses of [F3]. Applying that inequality and substituting the electric flux from step 2.1 yields ∣S∣gq≥(4π)−1(4π1−q2)2=4π(1−q2). The fixed parameter was arbitrary in (0,1], so both flux identities and the area bound hold in particular for all sufficiently small positive q.

Source notes

The article reference records attribution. The deduction uses the completed suppliers, not the article's assertion as a premise.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources