How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Theorem 4.2: charged horizon area lower bound
PDF p. 26: Theorem 4.2 and proof; PDF p. 27: Theorem 4.2 and proof
Statement
Assume the regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum model, with its original exterior section spacelike and maximal, ADM mass normalized to one, and stationary Killing field not identically zero on the bifurcation sphere . Use the single stationary primitive and Harrison fields supplied by the global Harrison construction. Work in ZFC. For all sufficiently small ,
Here , where is the area form of the induced metric on the oriented sphere. Define the electric and magnetic flux densities by and , with the orientation inherited from outward end spheres. In the same range,
The lower bound follows by combining these flux identities with the stability area–charge inequality.
Facts & Assumptions
The model, regularity, original maximal section and mass-one normalization are those in the Statement. A spacelike section has positive-definite induced metric; maximal means that its second fundamental form has zero trace. Stationary vacuum model and asymptotic normalization Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator
Work in ZFC, including the axiom of choice. The Axiom of Choice
The global one-form construction supplies the single smooth stationary primitive used in the Harrison family under these hypotheses. Closedness, periods and smooth global choice of W0
For each , the bifurcation-stability result supplies an individually admissible smooth spacelike maximal section with boundary . Its Statement also supplies a smooth spacelike extension agreeing with the section on its original side near , an outward normal-graph tube of radius allowed to depend on , and nonnegative principal eigenvalue in the future/outward gauge. Nonnegative principal eigenvalue of the horizon stability operator
For such a section and its extension and graph tube, the stable-horizon inequality gives . The horizon notation fixes the induced area form and the two flux-density identities in the Statement. Stable-horizon flux-energy and area-charge inequalities Horizon null frame, flux densities and stability operator notation
With the mass-one stationary end expansion established in [F8], the supplied primitive and the inherited orientation, the Harrison flux result gives and for . Proposition 2.1: electric and magnetic fluxes
The single-primitive family is . For the normalized Ernst potential , the Harrison definitions specify , , the metric and the electromagnetic form on their positive-denominator domain, using the same , spacetime orientation and Hodge convention. The definitions require a supplied zero of and ; they do not themselves supply the primitive. Single-potential construction of the Harrison one-form family Stationary Harrison one-form and metric Harrison electromagnetic form Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator
Under [A1], the denominator-positivity result applies to the smooth normalized Ernst data supplied by the global construction. It gives on the exterior and on one open neighborhood of for , with on . Positivity of the Harrison denominator and horizon bound Closedness, periods and smooth global choice of W0
For this same and polynomial family, the regular electrovacuum result supplies the Harrison metric and real electromagnetic form on the exterior and an open neighborhood of , where they are smooth in spacetime and satisfy the source-free Einstein–Maxwell equations. The orientations and fields are the same ones used by the flux and stability results. Proposition 2.1: Einstein–Maxwell equations and regularity
Under the regular stationary-vacuum hypotheses, the stationary-mass lemma gives , where is the ADM energy of the original exterior section. Thus [A1]'s ADM mass-one convention gives , and the regular end expansion becomes ; the bounds and are unchanged. Positive stationary mass from the bifurcate vacuum boundary Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator
Proof
Given: The model and construction hypotheses in the Statement.
Goal: Establish both flux identities and the area lower bound for all sufficiently small positive .
Proof technique: direct.
Fix . By [F8], the regular stationary-vacuum hypotheses in [A1] imply . The ADM mass-one assumption gives , so . Substitution into the regular end expansion yields , together with the unchanged bounds and . These are the exact end conditions required by [F4]. The regular model, maximal original section, mass-one normalization and nontrivial are exactly the hypotheses of the global primitive and regular electrovacuum results. By [F1], take their single and supplied pole with , and use the family in [F5]. The positivity conclusion [F6] applies to the supplied smooth normalized Ernst potential. At the pole, and hence ; also makes . Thus the parameter, pole and denominator conditions of both Harrison field definitions hold on the exterior and a neighborhood of . The regular realization [F7] gives these same smoothly through , with the prescribed orientation.
Apply [F4] using the exact mass-one stationary end expansion established in step 1.1, and the same primitive and inherited orientation. Restricting its two form identities to and using the density definitions in [F3] gives and . The section and boundary data needed for the horizon notation are supplied by [F2] and step 1.1.
The Statement of [F2] supplies an individually admissible section, its smooth spacelike extension across , its outward normal-graph tube and its outward stability, for the same fixed positive . Together with step 1.1 these satisfy the section, smooth-field and graph hypotheses of [F3]. Applying that inequality and substituting the electric flux from step 2.1 yields . The fixed parameter was arbitrary in , so both flux identities and the area bound hold in particular for all sufficiently small positive .
Source notes
The article reference records attribution. The deduction uses the completed suppliers, not the article's assertion as a premise.
Depends on
- Stationary vacuum model and asymptotic normalization
- Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime
- Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data
- Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator
- Horizon null frame, flux densities and stability operator notation
- Closedness, periods and smooth global choice of W0
- Nonnegative principal eigenvalue of the horizon stability operator
- Stable-horizon flux-energy and area-charge inequalities
- Proposition 2.1: electric and magnetic fluxes
- The Axiom of Choice
- Stationary Harrison one-form and metric
- Harrison electromagnetic form
- Single-potential construction of the Harrison one-form family
- Positivity of the Harrison denominator and horizon bound
- Proposition 2.1: Einstein–Maxwell equations and regularity
- Positive stationary mass from the bifurcate vacuum boundary
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- The uniqueness of smooth stationary black holes · PDF pp. 26–27, Theorem 4.2 and its proof