Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Temporal cutoff estimate for normals to maximal hypersurfaces

Statement

Let gj be smooth time-oriented Lorentz metrics of signature (−,+,+,+) on a common smooth four-manifold, converging in C2 to a Lorentz metric near a fixed compact set Q. Use a common time orientation and a fixed finite coordinate cover near Q, with uniformly bounded metric C2 and inverse-metric C0 norms. Let τ be a fixed smooth function, with past-directed timelike gj-gradient and αj2=−gj−1(dτ,dτ)≥a02>0 on Q∩{τ≥0}. Let Σj be smooth spacelike maximal hypersurfaces, smooth up to their actual boundaries, with future unit normals nj, such that the entire portions Σj∩{τ≥0} are compact and contained in Q. Set Vj=−αj−1grad⁡gjτ, vj=−gj(nj,Vj) and τmax⁡=max⁡Qmax⁡(τ,0) when Q is nonempty, and τmax⁡=0 when Q=∅. There is μ>4, depending only on a0, the uniform metric and inverse bounds and ∥τ∥C3(Q) in that cover, such that sup⁡Σj∩{τ>0}τμvj≤2max⁡{2τmax⁡μ, sup⁡∂Σj∩{τ>0}τμvj}. A supremum over an empty set is zero. In particular the boundary supremum is retained unless it is empty or separately bounded. No uniform bound on the normals is assumed in advance.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Work in ZFC, including the Axiom of Choice. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

The meanings of spacelike, future normal and maximality are Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data; past timelike gradient and temporal function have the convention of Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data. The temporal angle, operator and compact-portion conventions are Temporal normal angle and compact positive-height portions.

[F2]

The temporal gradient identity is Temporal angle and tangential height gradient identity; the conversion of a hyperbolic-angle differential inequality to the logarithmic one on {v>2} is From hyperbolic angle to logarithmic angle inequalities.

[F4]

Use the exact external differential estimate in the following External input section, under the complete geometric hypotheses of the Statement.

[F5]

Positive-base real powers are ar=exp⁡(rlog⁡a) for a>0 and real r; the supplementary convention is 0r=0 for r>0. Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention

External input

Import (B.11) of Radu, Appendix B: with the geometric hypotheses of the Statement and ηj=arcosh⁡vj, there is a uniform C≥1 such that on {vj>2}, ΔΣjηj≥coth⁡ηj(14∣∇Σjηj∣2−Cvj2) and ∣ΔΣjτ∣≤Cvj2. Its constant depends only on a0, the stated uniform coordinate metric/inverse bounds and the C3 norm of τ. This is an external geometric differential estimate, not a local reconstruction. The source derives it from (B.8)–(B.10) using Gauss–Codazzi, maximality and the trace-free eigenvalue bound in three tangent dimensions; the present proof imports that step with all its hypotheses.

Proof

Given: The sequence, compact portions and temporal function in the Statement, with imported differential estimate [F4].

Goal: Prove the stated uniform weighted angle bound.

1.1F1F2F4F5given

The temporal data are well defined by [F1]. If τmax⁡=0, including when Q=∅, containment of the entire nonnegative-height portions in Q implies that the positive-height sets are empty, so the conclusion holds for any fixed μ>4 by the zero-supremum convention. Otherwise put T=τmax⁡>0. By [F4] choose a common C≥1 for both differential estimates. By [F2] its hyperbolic-angle inequality gives Δlog⁡vj≥14∣∇log⁡vj∣2−Cvj2 on {vj>2}, and ∣∇τ∣2≥a02(vj2−1).

2.1F2F3F5step 1.1algebra∎

Choose a common μ>4 so that (μ2/4−μ)a02≥2C(T2+μT). The exclusion lemma [F3] rules out a local interior maximum of τμvj at positive height with vj>2. The compact maximum lemma [F3] then gives sup⁡τμvj≤max⁡{2Tμ,Bj}≤2max⁡{2Tμ,Bj}, where Bj is exactly the actual boundary supremum in the Statement. The choice of μ uses only the uniform geometric constant, a0 and T, itself bounded by the specified C3 norm. This proves the stated bound for every j with all boundary terms intact.

Source notes

The scalar argument follows the maximum-principle method of Radu, Appendix B, (B.11)–(B.12), using the explicitly proved conversion to log v and retaining the source’s conservative stated constant. The independent source is not the article under study. No graph existence, temporal-function existence, boundary-angle estimate or tensor-identity reconstruction is asserted. The compact sets must contain the entire nonnegative-height portions; replacing them by intersections with an arbitrary compact Q would introduce extra boundary terms.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

Alexandru F. Radu, Rigidity of stationary black holes with small ADM angular momentum, arXiv:2610.09729v1 · Appendix B, Lemma B.1 and (B.1), PDF/printed pp.35–36; proof (B.8)–(B.12), pp.38–39, especially (B.11)

In a time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold, for smooth Lorentz metrics g_j converging in C2 near a fixed compact Q, a fixed smooth τ with past timelike g_j-gradient and α_j²=-g_j^{-1}(dτ,dτ)≥a0²>0 on Q∩{τ≥0}, and smooth spacelike maximal Σ_j with future unit normals whose entire portions Σ_j∩{τ≥0} are compact and contained in Q, put V_j=-α_j^{-1}grad_{g_j}τ and v_j=-g_j(n_j,V_j). There is a uniform C such that, on {v_j>2}, η_j=arcosh v_j satisfies Δ_{Σ_j}η_j≥cothη_j(¼|∇_{Σ_j}η_j|²-Cv_j²) and |Δ_{Σ_j}τ|≤Cv_j². The constant is controlled by a0, the uniform coordinate C2 metric/C0 inverse bounds and the coordinate C3 norm of τ. Lemma B.1 concludes sup τ^μ v_j≤2 max{2τmax^μ,sup_{∂Σ_j∩{τ>0}}τ^μ v_j} for some μ>4 controlled by the same geometry. The empty boundary supremum is zero.

Hypotheses: Common time orientation, signature (-,+,+,+), spacetime dimension four; fixed finite coordinate cover near Q; uniform C2 bounds for g_j, C0 bounds for inverses, and C3 bounds for fixed τ; past timelike gradient with the stated lower norm bound; smooth spacelike maximal hypersurfaces and future unit normals, smooth up to their actual boundaries; entire nonnegative-height portions compact and contained in Q. No vacuum or field equation, stationary-graph representation, or boundary-angle bound is presumed; actual boundary terms are retained.

Reading limits: Read the v1 PDF text of Lemma B.1 and (B.1) on printed/PDF pp.35–36 and its proof (B.8)–(B.12) on pp.38–39 through web PDF retrieval during this repair. Checked the imported inequalities, geometric hypotheses, constant dependence and actual-boundary term against those passages. Page-image retrieval was unavailable. The tensor/coefficient estimates leading to (B.11) are imported established input and were not independently reconstructed. The local conversion and maximum lemmas and their application below supply the locally composed argument; they do not reconstruct those tensor estimates.

Sources