How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bloch cycle complexes and higher Chow groups
PDF p. 4: Smooth comparison with Bloch cycles
Definition
Let be a field, smooth of finite type over , and . For put . A nonempty coordinate face is obtained by setting a proper subset of the coordinates to zero. An integral closed subscheme of codimension is admissible if every component of its intersection with every such face has codimension in that face; empty intersections are allowed. Codimension is measured on the ambient irreducible component containing the generic point. Define as the free abelian group on the admissible subschemes.
For , identify with by retaining the remaining coordinates in increasing order and set where ranges over the components of and is its generic point. The empty sum is zero. Extend by integral linearity and set . Put for and for every . The resulting homological complex is Bloch's cycle complex , and its higher Chow groups are In particular they vanish for . This is the unnormalized complex; no quotient by degenerate simplices is taken.
Definition references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: as above.
Goal: Justify the coefficients, differential and homology quotient.
The admissible face lemma supplies finite coefficients, admissible face images and the identities for . Admissible face restrictions and their cycle identities
Alternating face sums form a chain complex, whose homology is the displayed quotient and vanishes in negative degrees. Alternating face boundaries square to zero, Homology object of a chain complex
Justification
The local rings in the coefficient formula need not be discrete valuation rings and the cycles need not be smooth. The proper single-face calculation in [F1] supplies exactly the finite lengths shown. The cycle-level compatibility in [F1] uses the explicitly imported simplicial-cycle input locally on integral smooth affine opens; no quotient by rational equivalence is used. Thus all face maps are defined, and [F2] gives and makes the homology quotient well-defined. This definition does not assert the separate comparison with motivic cohomology or the identification of degree zero with the classical Chow group.
Depends on
Used by · 19
- Degree zero and negative homology of the cycle complex
- Cycle complexes with fixed support
- Smooth motivic comparison
- Degree-zero Bloch cycles are ordinary cycles
- Boundaries in degree zero
- The degree-zero homology quotient
- Negative homology of the cycle complex
- Reindexing a comparison with higher Chow groups
- Classical Chow relations and Bloch boundaries
- Face boundaries preserve closed support
- Open restriction of admissible cycles
- The kernel of restriction is the supported subcomplex
- Higher-cycle localization including nonseparated schemes
- Normalization and the curve divisor quotient
- Cycle-complex degree translation
- Elmanto–Morrow smooth comparison input
- Point-supported cycles give all-weight chain purity and low-weight zero
- Separated raw-cycle Zariski descent input
- Actual raw simplicial cycles satisfy descent without separatedness
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.