Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normalization and the curve divisor quotient

PDF p. 13: Divisor presentation for supported degree six

Statement

Assume AC. Let T be an integral affine finite-type curve over an algebraically closed field, ν:C=T~→T its normalization, and K=k(T)=k(C). Write Q(D)=Z0(D)/div⁡D(k(D)×). Then ν∗div⁡C(f)=div⁡T(f) for f∈K×, and ν∗ induces Q(C)↠Q(T). Explicitly, ord⁡x(f)=∑y∈ν−1(x)ord⁡y(f), with DVR valuations upstairs and length orders downstairs. There is a canonical identification Pic⁡(C)=CH1(C)=Q(C) sending OC(y) to [y]; hence normalization induces a surjection from this Picard group to Q(T). Here Pic⁡ is the group of isomorphism classes of line bundles under tensor product and CH1 is degree-zero Bloch homology.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the curve and normalization in the Statement.

Goal: Establish divisor compatibility, surjectivity and the source identification.

[F1]

Normalization is finite, smooth and integral, has the same function field, and has nonempty finite closed fibers with residue fields k. Finite morphisms are proper under AC. Normalization of an affine integral curve, Residue fields and normalization point degrees, Finite morphisms are proper, The Axiom of Choice

[F2]

Proper dominant curve pushforward commutes with principal divisors and norms; closed points are weighted by residue degrees. External norm-divisor identity for integral curves

[F3]

A one-dimensional noetherian normal local domain is a DVR. Length orders agree with its normalized valuation. Equivalent characterizations of a DVR, Length orders on an integral curve

[F4]

On an integral scheme Cartier divisors modulo principal Cartier divisors map isomorphically to the Picard group via D↦O(D). A Cartier divisor is specified by local nonzero rational equations whose ratios are regular units. On an integral scheme, Cartier divisors modulo principal divisors compute the Picard group

[F5]

The codimension-one Bloch complex of the smooth curve has point cycles in degree zero and endpoint intersections in degree one; the endpoint boundary subgroup is the principal-divisor subgroup. Bloch cycle complexes and higher Chow groups, Principal divisors are endpoint boundaries

Proof

1.1F1F2given

The finite normalization is proper and dominant with field extension K/K. Applying [F2], whose norm is the identity in this case, yields ν∗div⁡C(f)=div⁡T(f). Each point in a closed fiber has residue degree one by [F1]; comparing coefficients gives the displayed order formula.

2.1F1step 1.1construct

The equality in step 1.1 makes pushforward descend to the quotient groups. Every closed point of T has a closed preimage by [F1], and each such point pushes forward with coefficient one. Lifting the finitely many points in any zero-cycle proves surjectivity.

3.1F1F3F4algebrastep 2.1

By [F1] and [F3], each closed-point local ring of C is a DVR. Taking valuations of the local equations of a Cartier divisor defines a zero-cycle: the support is finite by the finiteness of rational-function divisors on a finite trivializing cover. Unit ratios make the local valuations agree. If all valuations vanish, every equation is a unit at each closed point of its domain and also at the generic point, so the Cartier divisor is zero.

4.1F3F4step 3.1construct

For any closed y, a uniformizer is regular on a neighbourhood of y. Remove its other finitely many zeros from that neighbourhood. The uniformizer there and the equation one on C∖{y} have unit ratio on the overlap and define a Cartier divisor mapping to [y]. Therefore the map of step 3.1 is an isomorphism from Cartier divisors to zero-cycles, carrying principal Cartier divisors to principal length divisors. By [F4], Q(C)≅Pic⁡(C), with [y] corresponding to OC(y).

5.1F5step 2.1step 4.1∎

By [F5], degree-zero Bloch homology is the same quotient Q(C). Combining this identification with steps 2.1 and 4.1 proves the claimed source and surjection.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.