How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Images of support groups in global groups
PDF p. 6: Final two displays of Definition 2.7; PDF p. 7: Equation (2.8), K-zero support-image notation
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice and the size conventions of the support construction. Fix a field , a quasi-compact quasi-separated -scheme , and a closed subset with its reduced induced closed-subscheme structure. Put . Let and .
Use the support spectra and their support-to-global maps from the preceding support definition. In particular, is the image of in , and is the image of in . An image is the subgroup consisting of the values of the indicated homomorphism. Define
where the arrow is induced by the support-to-global map on -theory. For supported motivic cohomology and global motivic cohomology , define
for every integer ; in particular this includes the article's degree . The arrow is the support-to-global map. Finally, put
These are image subgroups of the respective global groups; the supported groups are their domains before the final image is taken. No injectivity of a support-to-global map is part of the definition.
Definition references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field, scheme, closed subset, complement, choice and size conventions, and indices in the definition.
Goal: Show that each displayed map has the stated target and that each image is a well-defined subgroup.
The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Choice, discharges the inherited Choice hypotheses of the support and global filtration constructions invoked in [F1] and [F2]. The subgroup-image argument below requires no additional choice principle.
Motivic and filtered K theory with support supplies the filtered and unfiltered support spectra as fibers, their compatible maps to the corresponding global spectra, and the supported motivic cohomology groups and support-to-global homomorphisms. Its construction also specifies the extension used when is not quasi-compact.
Motivic filtration and image groups defines and as the image of the global stage-to- homomorphism. The stage-to- maps are compatible with restriction.
Motivic complexes and cohomology defines the global group . The support definition in [F1] identifies its support-to-global target with this group, using the stated cohomological indexing convention.
Justification
1.1 The compatible support and global stage-to- maps form a commutative square after applying . If an element of is represented by an element of , its image in is represented by the image of that element in . It therefore belongs to . The map is the restriction of the homomorphism on unfiltered -theory, so it is independent of the chosen representative. [A1, F1, F2, given]
2.1 The image of a group homomorphism is a subgroup: zero is the image of zero, and the difference of two image elements is the image of the difference of their preimages. Apply this to the homomorphism in step 1.1 and to the support-to-global homomorphisms for motivic cohomology and unfiltered -theory. The resulting subgroups are exactly the three displayed definitions. The construction uses no injectivity; it justifies the definitions and their stated targets. [F1, F3, step 1.1] ∎
Indexing and scope
The supported cohomology supplier uses an explicit shift to reconcile the article's displayed notation with the global cohomological convention. The image in degree is taken using that supplier's support-to-global map. The construction does not identify with the -theory of a category of supported perfect complexes.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Jean Fasel and Maria Yakerson, Vector bundles on singular surfaces and threefolds · PDF p. 6, Definition 2.7, final two displays; p. 7, equation (2.8)