How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Smooth-point K theory class map
PDF p. 7: Equation (2.8)
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice and the size conventions of the support construction. Let be a perfect field, a quasi-compact quasi-separated -scheme, and a closed point at which is smooth. A perfect field is a field all of whose algebraic extensions are separable; smooth at means that has an open neighbourhood on which the structure morphism is smooth. Put .
Write for the fiber of the restriction map , and . The support-image group is the image of . Let be the canonical isomorphism of Excision and K theory purity at a smooth closed point, normalized so that the supported class of the residue sheaf maps to , where is the closed immersion. Define
as followed by the support-to-global homomorphism, with its codomain restricted to its image. In particular, in , where the bracket is the class of the perfect residue sheaf. The map need not be injective.
Facts & Assumptions
The assumed The Axiom of Choice and size conventions discharge the inherited premises of the supported purity isomorphism [F1] and the support-image definition [F2] in steps 1.1–3.1. Taking an inverse isomorphism and composing the given homomorphisms adds no choice requirement.
Given: The field, scheme, point, choice and size conventions in the definition.
Goal: Establish that is a well-defined homomorphism with the stated target and normalization.
Excision and K theory purity at a smooth closed point gives the canonical isomorphism under these hypotheses and identifies the inverse image of with the supported residue-sheaf class; its support-to-global image is the class of the perfect sheaf in .
Images of support groups in global groups defines as the image of the support-to-global homomorphism and hence as a subgroup of , without asserting injectivity.
Justification
1.1 By [F1], is an isomorphism of abelian groups, so its inverse is a well-defined homomorphism from to . Composing it with support-to-global gives a homomorphism to . [A1, F1, given]
2.1 By [F2], every value of this composite lies in , so restricting its codomain defines the displayed homomorphism. Since is surjective, its composite has image exactly . [A1, F2, step 1.1]
3.1 By [F1], the value at is . Additivity gives the formula for every integer . The construction makes no injectivity assertion about support-to-global; thus it does not assert that is injective. This establishes the definition and its stated properties. [A1, F1, F2, step 2.1] ∎
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Jean Fasel and Maria Yakerson, Vector bundles on singular surfaces and threefolds · PDF p. 7, the purity display and equation (2.8)