Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth-point K theory class map

PDF p. 7: Equation (2.8)

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the size conventions of the support construction. Let k be a perfect field, X a quasi-compact quasi-separated k-scheme, and x a closed point at which X→Spec⁡k is smooth. A perfect field is a field all of whose algebraic extensions are separable; smooth at x means that x has an open neighbourhood on which the structure morphism is smooth. Put U=X∖{x}.

Write K(X/U) for the fiber of the restriction map K(X)→K(U), and K0(X)=π0K(X). The support-image group K0({x};X) is the image of π0K(X/U)→K0(X). Let px:π0K(X/U)→∼Z be the canonical isomorphism of Excision and K theory purity at a smooth closed point, normalized so that the supported class of the residue sheaf i∗κ(x) maps to 1, where i:Spec⁡κ(x)↪X is the closed immersion. Define

φx:Z⟶K0({x};X)⊆K0(X)

as px−1 followed by the support-to-global homomorphism, with its codomain restricted to its image. In particular, φx(n)=n[i∗κ(x)] in K0(X), where the bracket is the class of the perfect residue sheaf. The map need not be injective.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The assumed The Axiom of Choice and size conventions discharge the inherited premises of the supported purity isomorphism [F1] and the support-image definition [F2] in steps 1.1–3.1. Taking an inverse isomorphism and composing the given homomorphisms adds no choice requirement.

Given: The field, scheme, point, choice and size conventions in the definition.

Goal: Establish that φx is a well-defined homomorphism with the stated target and normalization.

[F1]

Excision and K theory purity at a smooth closed point gives the canonical isomorphism px under these hypotheses and identifies the inverse image of 1 with the supported residue-sheaf class; its support-to-global image is the class of the perfect sheaf i∗κ(x) in K0(X).

[F2]

Images of support groups in global groups defines K0({x};X) as the image of the support-to-global homomorphism and hence as a subgroup of K0(X), without asserting injectivity.

Justification

1.1 By [F1], px is an isomorphism of abelian groups, so its inverse is a well-defined homomorphism from Z to π0K(X/U). Composing it with support-to-global gives a homomorphism to K0(X). [A1, F1, given]

2.1 By [F2], every value of this composite lies in K0({x};X), so restricting its codomain defines the displayed homomorphism. Since px−1 is surjective, its composite has image exactly K0({x};X). [A1, F2, step 1.1]

3.1 By [F1], the value at 1 is [i∗κ(x)]. Additivity gives the formula for every integer n. The construction makes no injectivity assertion about support-to-global; thus it does not assert that φx is injective. This establishes the definition and its stated properties. [A1, F1, F2, step 2.1] ∎

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources