How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Subgroup generated by smooth closed points
PDF p. 2: Before Theorem C; PDF p. 14: Definition 6.5
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice and the size conventions of the support construction. Let be a perfect field, meaning that every algebraic extension of is separable, and let be a quasi-compact quasi-separated -scheme of pure finite dimension . Thus has a finite affine open cover, intersections of quasi-compact opens are quasi-compact, and every irreducible component has dimension ; dimension is the supremum of lengths of chains of distinct irreducible closed subsets. Take .
Let be the set of closed points at which is smooth: each such point has an open neighbourhood smooth over . For each , Smooth-point K theory class map gives a homomorphism , with , where is the closed immersion and the bracket denotes the class of the perfect residue sheaf. Here for the nonconnective -theory spectrum of perfect complexes.
The smooth-point subgroup is Here the direct sum consists of integer families with finite support, and its displayed map sends to the finite sum . The target is the image of as defined in Motivic filtration and image groups. Equivalently, is the subgroup of generated by the classes for . If is empty, it is zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field, scheme, dimension, choice and size hypotheses in the definition.
Goal: Justify the displayed map, its image subgroup, and the equivalent description by generators.
Smooth-point K theory class map constructs each under these hypotheses, identifies its value at with the residue-sheaf class, and makes it a group homomorphism.
Smooth point classes lie in the top filtration piece proves that the image of each lies in for a pure finite-dimensional qcqs scheme over a perfect field, with the stated choice and size assumptions. Motivic filtration and image groups defines that group as a subgroup of .
Justification
1.1 For every , [F1] gives a homomorphism to and [F2] allows its codomain to be restricted to the filtration subgroup. For a finitely supported integer family, the sum of its values is therefore a well-defined element of that subgroup. Finite sums and the homomorphism property of each make the displayed assignment a homomorphism. [F1, F2, given]
2.1 Its image is a subgroup of the target: zero is the image of the zero family, and sums and inverses of images are images of the corresponding sums and inverses of families. Every image is a finite integer linear combination of the values , and every such combination is the image of a finitely supported family. By [F1] these values are the stated residue-sheaf classes. If is empty, the direct sum and its image are zero. This establishes the definition and its equivalent generator description. [F1, step 1.1] ∎
Depends on
Used by · 11
- Smooth points generate the third motivic piece
- Levine–Weibel cycle image with pure-dimensional and component conventions
- Removing normality from the article results
- Distinguishing smooth-point and motivic filtration notation
- Removing isolated points from the support
- Extending the geometric support method to higher dimensions
- Unique divisibility of the smooth-point subgroup
- Murthy splitting input in rank three
- The quotient cycle map has exactly the smooth-point image
- Dimension-specific point images and a precise lower-component obstruction
- Euler-group comparison and the article's expectation
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Jean Fasel and Maria Yakerson, Vector bundles on singular surfaces and threefolds · PDF p. 2, notation before Theorem C; p. 14, Definition 6.5; p. 7, equation (2.8)