How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Murthy splitting input in rank three
PDF p. 17: Proof of Corollary 6.10, Mur94 Theorem 3.8
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and the size conventions of the cited perfect K-theory and smooth-point constructions. Let be an algebraically closed field and let be a normal affine -scheme of finite type and dimension . Let be a rank-three vector bundle on , and put If in , then for a rank-two vector bundle .
In particular, this applies when is trivial in for pure-dimensional . If also has lower-dimensional components, the corresponding hypothesis may instead be stated using the zero-extended top-dimensional subgroup ; it does not include all smooth points on those lower-dimensional components.
Here a vector bundle is a finite locally free sheaf, and rank three means locally isomorphic to . Normal means that all local rings are integrally closed domains. The group is the degree-zero perfect K-theory group in Rank-three alternating exterior class. The pure smooth-point subgroup in Subgroup generated by smooth closed points is generated by the classes of residue sheaves at smooth closed points. Its top-dimensional zero extension for a nonpure normal scheme is specified in Dimension-specific point images and a precise lower-component obstruction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field, scheme, bundle, choice and size hypotheses in the statement, and in .
Goal: Construct a decomposition of into a trivial line and a rank-two bundle, and establish the stated subgroup implications.
Affine bundles and finite projective modules identifies vector bundles on with finite projective -modules, compatibly with rank, direct sums and duals. Affine perfect K zero and bundle K zero identifies the projective-module Grothendieck group with the specified perfect and sends a bounded finite-projective resolution to its alternating class.
For , The actual exterior-dual class in affine perfect K zero identifies , where , with the dual exterior class in perfect . It also proves that this class and vanish simultaneously.
Unique divisibility of the smooth-point subgroup gives unique divisibility, in particular absence of -torsion, for the pure smooth-point subgroup and for its zero-extended top-dimensional counterpart. Dimension-specific point images and a precise lower-component obstruction identifies the latter's generators as the residue classes of smooth closed points on the three-dimensional components.
Murthy splitting criterion for the exterior-dual obstruction imports Murthy's criterion: for a reduced affine algebra of dimension over an algebraically closed field, if the subgroup of projective generated by residue-field classes of height- smooth closed points has no torsion, then a rank- finite projective module splits off a free rank-one summand when its exterior-dual class vanishes. Its external-input section and reference give the precise source and reading limits.
Proof
A finite-type algebra over a field is noetherian, and normality makes reduced. By [F1], is finite projective of constant rank , and is its associated bundle. The affine K-zero comparison in [F1] is an isomorphism.
Let be the subgroup in [F4] for . A height-three smooth closed point lies on a three-dimensional component, and conversely a smooth closed point on a three-dimensional component has height three. Over the perfect field , these are the point classes in [F3]. Their residue modules admit finite projective resolutions: at such a point the local ring is regular, while the residue module is supported only there; the associated perfect residue sheaf has the same class as the alternating resolution by [F1]. Hence the comparison in [F1] identifies with in the pure case and with in the general normal case. By [F3], multiplication by is injective on that image, and therefore on . Thus has no torsion.
By [F2], implies that the image of in perfect is zero. The comparison is injective by [F1], so in projective . The reducedness, dimension, field, rank and factorial-torsion hypotheses of [F4] now hold. It follows that for a finite projective module of rank two. Applying the affine equivalence gives , where is a rank-two vector bundle.
The pure smooth-point subgroup and the zero-extended top-dimensional subgroup are subgroups of by their definitions. Thus an element trivial in either subgroup is zero in , and step 3.1 applies. The stated nonpure convention follows from [F3]. This proves the splitting implication and its subgroup formulations.
Depends on
- Rank-three alternating exterior class
- Subgroup generated by smooth closed points
- Affine bundles and finite projective modules
- Affine perfect K zero and bundle K zero
- The actual exterior-dual class in affine perfect K zero
- Dimension-specific point images and a precise lower-component obstruction
- Unique divisibility of the smooth-point subgroup
- Murthy splitting criterion for the exterior-dual obstruction
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by · 1
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Jean Fasel and Maria Yakerson, Vector bundles on singular surfaces and threefolds · PDF p. 17, proof of Corollary 6.10, final sentence