Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Third Chern vanishing and a trivial summand

PDF p. 3: Splitting criterion after Corollary D; PDF p. 17: Corollary 6.10 proof

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the site and universe size bounds required by the cited motivic filtration, support and Chern constructions. Let k be an algebraically closed field of arbitrary characteristic, let X=Spec⁡A be a normal affine k-scheme of finite type and Krull dimension three, and let E be a rank-three vector bundle on X. Then c3(E)=0⟺E≅E′⊕OX for some rank-two vector bundle E′ on X.

Here algebraically closed means that every nonconstant polynomial over k has a root in k; finite type means that A is a finitely generated k-algebra; normal means that every local ring is an integrally closed domain; and Krull dimension is the supremum of lengths of chains of distinct irreducible closed subsets. A vector bundle is a finite locally free OX-module, and rank r means locally isomorphic to OXr. The class c3(E) is the third integral motivic Chern class in Hmot6,3(X,Z), the degree-six cohomology of the weight-three motivic complex. The Axiom of Choice says that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; the size bounds fix the sites and universes used by the cited constructions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: k, X and E as in the statement, the Axiom of Choice and the stated site and universe bounds.

Goal: Prove both implications of the displayed equivalence.

[F1]

Rank-three alternating exterior class defines the alternating exterior class β(E)=[OX]−[E]+[Λ2E]−[det⁡E]∈K0(X), where det⁡E=Λ3E and K0(X) is the degree-zero K-theory group of perfect complexes. A perfect complex is locally quasi-isomorphic to a bounded complex of finite locally free sheaves.

[F2]

Under the given hypotheses, Chern classes of the alternating exterior class proves that β(E) lies in Fmot3K0(X) and that c3(β(E))=−2c3(E). The group Fmot3K0(X) is the image in K0(X) of the degree-zero homotopy group of the third motivic filtration stage.

[F3]

Under the same hypotheses, Third Chern isomorphism says that the actual third Chern operation on perfect K-classes restricts to an isomorphism c3:Fmot3K0(X)→Hmot6,3(X,Z). In particular this restriction is injective.

[F4]

Murthy splitting input in rank three says that, under the given hypotheses, β(E)=0 in K0(X) implies E≅E′⊕OX for a rank-two bundle E′.

[F5]

Motivic Chern classes defines the total Chern polynomial ct(V)=∑ici(V)ti of a bundle V and sets ci(V)=0 for i greater than its rank. Whitney identities and virtual Chern arithmetic gives ct(V⊕W)=ct(V)ct(W); in particular a trivial line has total Chern polynomial 1. The Axiom of Choice states the Choice assumption used by these constructions.

Proof

technique · Apply the third-Chern isomorphism to the alternating exterior class, then use the splitting criterion; the converse follows from Whitney and rank vanishing
1.1givenF2

Suppose c3(E)=0. By [F2], β(E) belongs to the third motivic image piece and c3(β(E))=−2c3(E)=0.

2.1F3step 1.1

The restricted third Chern operation in [F3] is injective. Since β(E) lies in its domain and maps to zero, β(E)=0 in Fmot3K0(X) and hence in its ambient group K0(X).

3.1givenF4step 2.1

Apply [F4] to this vanishing. All its field, normality, finite-type, dimension, rank, Choice and size hypotheses are those given here. It yields a rank-two bundle E′ and an isomorphism E≅E′⊕OX.

4.1givenF5step 3.1

Conversely, suppose E≅E′⊕OX with E′ of rank two. By [F5], ct(E)=ct(E′)ct(OX)=ct(E′). The coefficient of t3 on the right is zero because E′ has rank two. Thus c3(E)=0.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

Steps 1.1–4.1 prove both implications and hence the stated equivalence.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources