How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Motivic Chern classes
PDF p. 2: Displayed motivic Chern classes; PDF p. 8: Section 3, first display
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice and the suitable universes used by the supplied constructions. Let be a field, a quasi-compact quasi-separated -scheme, and a vector bundle of constant rank on . A vector bundle means a finite locally free -module. Write for the supplied integral motivic cohomology , with its natural bigraded ring structure.
If , let be the projective bundle of rank-one quotients of , let be its tautological quotient line bundle, and put , using the supplied orientation on line bundles. Define the motivic Chern classes for as the unique coefficients satisfying Set and for . For the rank-zero bundle use the same conventions and for , without using a projective bundle. The total Chern series of an actual bundle is , a polynomial with constant term one.
For every this construction defines a map , where is the set of isomorphism classes of rank- bundles. It is natural under pullback of -schemes. These definitions apply to singular as well as smooth schemes. The article also uses total Chern classes of virtual bundle classes; their extension and its Whitney identity are supplied separately and are not part of this definition.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , a qcqs -scheme , a constant-rank bundle , the Axiom of Choice and the suitable universes of the supplied constructions.
Goal: Define the stated coefficients and justify their existence, uniqueness, invariance under bundle isomorphism and pullback naturality.
Assume the Axiom of Choice, as formulated in The Axiom of Choice. This discharges the Choice hypotheses of the projective-bundle and coefficient-uniqueness suppliers [F1] and [F2] in steps 1.1–3.1, and of the bundle-class supplier [F3] in step 2.1.
The supplied motivic cohomology, extended by zero in negative weights, is an additively oriented bigraded theory on qcqs -schemes. For a positive-rank bundle its quotient projective bundle has the projective-bundle isomorphism in every bidegree, with powers of the first Chern class of the tautological quotient line. Pullbacks preserve the unit and ring operations. Motivic projective bundle formula
In such a theory, for a rank- bundle the displayed monic relation has unique coefficients in the stated bidegrees, and those coefficients commute with pullback. The rank-zero convention is preserved by pullback. Chern coefficients of the projective relation
A vector bundle is finite locally free; is the set of isomorphism classes of rank- bundles. Isomorphism classes of vector bundles
Justification
1.1 The hypotheses of [F1] and [F2] hold for and . When , [F2] therefore supplies exactly one coefficient in each indicated bidegree satisfying the displayed relation. The unit and zero classes used for and for indices above the rank exist in the bigraded ring; the separate rank-zero prescription is consequently defined without a projective-bundle assertion. These choices give a polynomial with constant coefficient one. [A1, F1, F2, given]
2.1 An isomorphism induces an isomorphism of quotient projective bundles over carrying the tautological quotient line to the corresponding quotient line. By naturality of its first Chern class, the two defining relations correspond. Their coefficients agree by uniqueness in [F2]. The prescribed zero and unit coefficients also agree, so each is well-defined on the set of isomorphism classes in [F3]. The same conclusion holds in rank zero by its explicit convention. [A1, F1, F2, F3, step 1.1]
3.1 For a morphism of qcqs -schemes, the pullback bundle has rank . For , [F2] gives ; for or this follows from preservation of the unit and zero. The rank-zero case follows from the same conventions. Thus the maps are natural, and no smoothness hypothesis has been used. This completes the justification. [A1, F1, F2, step 1.1, step 2.1] ∎
Depends on
Used by · 18
- A nontrivial rank-two bundle with trivial Chern classes on a smooth complex affine fourfold
- Rank-two bundles with prescribed first two classes
- Rank-two uniqueness on singular threefolds
- Removing normality from the article results
- Total Chern series for actual and virtual bundles
- Whitney identities and virtual Chern arithmetic
- Second Chern class need not be additive on the first piece
- Third Chern vanishing and a trivial summand
- The source Chern classes are the supplied projective-relation classes
- Actual exact-sequence Whitney and filtered-root formula on singular qcqs schemes
- Clopen rank extension and genuine representative independence
- The source Chern classes are the supplied projective-relation classes
- Actual exact-sequence Whitney and filtered-root formula on singular qcqs schemes
- Clopen rank extension and genuine representative independence
- The actual Chern series of a trivial bundle is the unit
- Agreement with the existing projective-relation and virtual bundle first classes
- Actual supported Chern operation and its smooth comparison
- Projective relations transport the actual universal Chern operations
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Jean Fasel and Maria Yakerson, Vector bundles on singular surfaces and threefolds · p. 2, displayed motivic Chern classes; p. 8, Section 3, first display