Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Actual exact-sequence Whitney and filtered-root formula on singular qcqs schemes

PDF p. 8: Actual Chern and Whitney identities; PDF p. 11: Total virtual Chern class

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the fixed site-size and universe bounds of the supplied motivic constructions. Let X be any qcqs k-scheme over a field, and let 0→V′→V→V′′→0 be an exact sequence of constant-rank finite locally free sheaves. Then ct(V)=ct(V′)ct(V′′). If V has a filtration by subbundles with line quotients Ls, then ct(V)=∏s(1+c1(Ls)t). These refer to the supplied projective-relation classes, not to an assumed Chern polynomial of a K-zero equality.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume The Axiom of Choice and the stated size bounds. These discharge the foundational hypotheses of the EM comparison and Chern constructions used in steps 1.1–3.1.

[F1]

External non-A¹ projective-relation filtered and Whitney theorem supplies Lemma4.4.3(ii)–(iii) for a homotopy-commutative linearly oriented non-A¹ motivic ring spectrum with PBF over any qcqs derived base S, evaluated on Y∈SmS.

[F2]

The source Chern classes are the supplied projective-relation classes supplies the actual EM class comparison for a field k, qcqs k-base S and smooth qcqs S-scheme Y, under [A1]. Its source-side conventions are zero coefficients above rank and c~t(0)=1. Motivic Chern classes gives the corresponding supplied zero-bundle convention and invariance under bundle isomorphism.

[F3]

An actual non-A¹ P¹-spectrum for the supplied EM complexes supplies, for every qcqs k-base S, the actual homotopy-commutative non-A1 motivic ring spectrum ES with its product-preserving diagonal identifications on smooth qcqs S-schemes. Actual EM orientation and projective bundle maps on that model supplies the linear orientation on this same model, its actual EM first Chern class, and the source class-power projective-bundle formula. These, rather than class comparison alone, discharge the model hypotheses of [F1].

Proof

Given: A field k, the qcqs k-scheme X, the exact sequence or filtration, the Axiom of Choice and the stated bounds.

Goal: Apply the full source theorem within its real hypotheses.

1.1A1F1F2F3givenconstruct

Take the source base to be S=X, regarded as a classical derived scheme, and take Y=X with the identity smooth map. Smooth derived schemes over a classical base are classical, so the EM restriction used in the model is defined on this smooth site. No assertion that X is smooth over k is needed. By [F3] the model is a homotopy-commutative linearly oriented motivic ring spectrum with the actual PBF. The diagonal identifications preserve its products, and [F2] identifies the projective-relation coefficients with the supplied Chern classes.

2.1A1F1F2step 1.1

The exact sequence is locally split since its quotient is locally free. Its associated sheaf-complex triangle is therefore a fiber sequence of vector bundles as required by [F1]. When both end terms have positive rank, apply part (iii) and transport the equality through [F2]. If an end term has rank zero, it is the zero sheaf and the other map is an isomorphism; isomorphism invariance and the convention ct(0)=1 prove the same identity, including the case in which all terms are zero. This proves Whitney in the required non-A¹ theory.

3.1A1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1∎

For a positive-rank filtered bundle, apply part (ii) of [F1] to the filtration to obtain the displayed root factorization, again using [F2]. The geometric splitting trick underlying this implication is imported through that lemma, not inferred from a mere flag or K-zero equality. For the zero bundle the empty filtration has empty product 1=ct(0), so the formula includes rank zero explicitly.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources