Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The source Chern classes are the supplied projective-relation classes

PDF p. 8: Actual Chern and Whitney identities; PDF p. 11: Total virtual Chern class

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the fixed site-size and universe bounds of the supplied motivic constructions. Let k be a field, S a qcqs k-scheme, Y a smooth qcqs S-scheme, and V a finite locally free sheaf of constant rank r≥0 on Y. Use the supplied non-A1 EM model ES with its actual additive orientation and natural diagonal identifications ES2i,i(Y)≅Hmot2i,i(Y,Z) for i≥0.

For r>0 the coefficients of Annala–Iwasa Definition 4.4.1 agree under these identifications with the supplied projective-relation coefficients ci(V). Extend the source-side polynomial by zero coefficients above rank and, for the zero bundle, by c~t(0)=1. With these explicit local conventions the agreement holds for every i≥0 and every constant rank, including zero. Definition 4.4.1 itself starts at positive rank. For a line the first coefficient is the original additive EM orientation and all higher coefficients are zero.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice as in The Axiom of Choice and the stated site-size and universe bounds. This supplies the foundational hypotheses of the model and Chern-coefficient constructions invoked in steps 1.1 and 2.1; no additional bundle or affine-torsor choices are made here.

[F2]

Motivic Chern classes and Chern coefficients of the projective relation give the unique coefficients of the supplied quotient-projective relation, including rank-zero conventions.

Proof

Given: k,S,Y,V, the Axiom of Choice and the stated bounds, and the explicit source-side extensions in the statement.

Goal: Identify the actual coefficients and signs.

1.1A1F1F2given

For r>0 the source relation is ∑j=0r(−1)jξjπ∗c~r−j(V)=0, with c~0=1. Multiply by (−1)r and set i=r−j. It becomes ξr+∑i=1r(−1)iπ∗c~i(V)ξr−i=0. The orientation and quotient O(1) are the same by [F1]. Hence coefficient uniqueness in [F2] gives c~i(V)=ci(V) for 1≤i≤r; both zeroth coefficients are the unit.

2.1A1F1F2step 1.1∎

For rank1, the quotient projective bundle is Y, its tautological quotient is V, and the relation is ξ−c1(V)=0. It therefore identifies the first coefficient with the original orientation, which is additive under tensor product. Above positive rank the declared zero-coefficient extension agrees with the supplied convention. In rank zero the source-side series is 1 by our explicit local extension of Definition 4.4.1, and the supplied series is 1 by [F2]; no relation on the empty projective bundle is used. These statements identify the whole actual series, with no virtual extension used.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources