How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Isomorphism classes of vector bundles
PDF p. 2: Paragraph before Theorem A; PDF p. 11: Proof of Proposition 5.5, notation for the unit
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice and the suitable universes used for the supplied perfect K-theory construction. Let be a quasi-compact, quasi-separated scheme and a nonnegative integer. A vector bundle on is a finite locally free -module: each point has an open neighbourhood on which it is isomorphic to a finite direct sum of copies of . It has rank if every point has such a neighbourhood with exactly copies. An isomorphism of vector bundles is an invertible -linear morphism. Write for the set of their isomorphism classes and for the class of a rank- bundle in that set.
The supplied nonconnective perfect K-theory spectrum is , and . A bundle , regarded as a complex concentrated in degree zero, is perfect. Write for its object class in this spectral K-zero group. The unit of the ring is denoted . Here denotes a K-zero class, not an isomorphism class in .
If for a commutative unital ring , the supplied affine comparison identifies this with the vector-bundle Grothendieck group: the abelian group generated by bundle isomorphism classes subject to for every short exact sequence of vector bundles. Under the comparison the two meanings of agree. This affine assertion makes no identification of perfect K-theory with coherent-sheaf G-theory.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A quasi-compact, quasi-separated scheme , a nonnegative integer , the Axiom of Choice and suitable universes.
Goal: Define the set of bundle isomorphism classes and justify the spectral class, unit and stated affine comparison.
A finite locally free sheaf has well-defined local rank, and a bundle is locally a finite free sheaf. Locally free sheaves of finite rank
A complex locally quasi-isomorphic to a bounded complex of finite locally free sheaves is perfect. The perfect category contains such complexes. Perfect complexes on schemes and their support
For qcqs , the supplied spectrum is defined on the essentially small perfect category; its multiplication has unit induced by . For a small idempotent-complete stable category, the object-class map identifies the cofiber Grothendieck group with of its supplied nonconnective K-theory. Nonconnective K theory of perfect complexes, Nonconnective K theory in degree zero
Assuming AC and suitable universes, for with commutative and unital, the spectral degree-zero group is canonically isomorphic to the vector-bundle Grothendieck group and sends the spectral class of to the bundle class of . Affine perfect K zero and bundle K zero
The article conventions define qcqs schemes and use finite locally free sheaves as vector bundles. Article scheme conventions, The Axiom of Choice
Justification
1.1 The open subsets of form a set. For each indexed open cover drawn from that set, rank- bundles trivialized on the cover are described up to isomorphism by transition matrices in satisfying the identity, inverse and cocycle conditions. These matrices form a set; changing trivializations acts by a set of invertible matrices, and its equivalence classes form a set. Taking the union over covers and identifying data defining isomorphic sheaves gives a set of isomorphism classes. Every rank- bundle occurs by its local triviality, and an isomorphism preserves local rank. Thus is well-defined, including when is empty. [F1, F5, construct]
2.1 By local freeness, is locally a bounded complex of finite locally free sheaves, so it is an object of . The object-class map in [F3] assigns it a well-defined element of , invariant under isomorphism. The unit statement in [F3] identifies the multiplicative unit with the class of . [F2, F3, step 1.1]
3.1 If as stated, the hypotheses of [F4] hold; its comparison identifies the spectral and vector-bundle classes on every generator. This establishes the stated notation and affine comparison. No corresponding identification with coherent G-theory is used. [F4, step 2.1] ∎
Depends on
Used by · 20
- Euler class of a regular bundle functional
- A nontrivial rank-two bundle with trivial Chern classes on a smooth complex affine fourfold
- Motivic Chern classification on normal affine surfaces
- Motivic Chern classification on normal affine threefolds
- Rank-two uniqueness on singular threefolds
- Removing normality from the article results
- Motivic projective bundle formula
- Motivic Chern classes
- Total Chern series for actual and virtual bundles
- Critical-rank cancellation used in the article
- Bertini functional with finite smooth zero locus
- Rank-three alternating exterior class
- Spectral K-zero equality gives an actual projective stabilization
- The ordinary Chow Chern map on isomorphism classes
- Rank-two Chern map and its fixed-invariant fibers
- Spectral K-zero equality gives an actual projective stabilization
- The actual exterior-dual class in affine perfect K zero
- Determinants detect vanishing of the rank-one exterior-dual class
- The zero-dimensional critical-rank boundary
- Stable triviality fixes the K-zero class and determinant
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Jean Fasel and Maria Yakerson, Vector bundles on singular surfaces and threefolds · p. 2, paragraph before Theorem A; p. 11, proof of Proposition 5.5