How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Nonconnective K theory in degree zero
PDF p. 12: Bundle classes in spectral K zero
Statement
For a small idempotent-complete stable infinity-category C, the canonical map from the abelian group generated by equivalence classes of objects, subject to [Y]=[X]+[Z] for every cofiber sequence X→Y→Z, to π₀𝕂(C) is an isomorphism. Here 𝕂 is the nonconnective algebraic K-theory functor of Blumberg–Gepner–Tabuada. The isomorphism sends the generator of an object to its K-theory class.
Idempotent complete means that every idempotent endomorphism splits. A cofiber sequence is a sequence X→Y→Z in which Z is the pushout of X→Y along X→0. The group is the cofiber Grothendieck group.
External input
This is the established degree-zero comparison recalled in Kasprowski–Winges, §2.2, applied to an idempotent-complete category. Their §2.1 identifies the nonconnective functor with the BGT localizing invariant. Only the passages specified in sources.references were read; no local reconstruction of this theorem is claimed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A small idempotent-complete stable infinity-category C and the cited nonconnective functor.
Goal: Identify π₀𝕂(C) with the cofiber Grothendieck group, with the stated generator map.
The external input identifies π₀𝕂(C) with the cofiber Grothendieck group of the idempotent completion of C, naturally in C, by the object-class map.
Proof
Since C is idempotent complete, its canonical inclusion into its idempotent completion is an equivalence. Thus the cofiber Grothendieck group appearing in [F1] is the group presented using the objects and cofiber sequences of C.
Apply [F1] to C and use step 1.1. The resulting natural isomorphism sends each object generator to its K-theory class, as asserted.
Depends on
Used by · 8
- Affine perfect K zero and bundle K zero
- Perfect residue classes at smooth closed points
- Dévissage of K zero with regular ambient support
- Euler class of a regular bundle functional
- Isomorphism classes of vector bundles
- Postnikov inverse and the specified nonconnective degree-zero group
- Determinant descends on the actual perfect K zero
- Every actual motivic stage on the empty scheme is zero
Dependency tree · 1 level
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text.
External dependencies
For a small stable infinity-category C, its cofiber Grothendieck group after idempotent completion is naturally isomorphic to π₀ of its nonconnective K-theory spectrum; in particular the completion can be omitted when C is idempotent complete.
Hypotheses: C is a small stable infinity-category; the stated specialization assumes C is idempotent complete.
Reading limits: Read the source title, §2.1 identification of its nonconnective functor with the BGT functor, and the stated paragraph in §2.2. The underlying proofs of the recalled comparison were not reconstructed or independently read in full.
Definition 9.6 constructs the nonconnective K-theory functor; Remark 9.33 records its degree-zero comparison with connective K-theory in the stated Waldhausen setting.
Hypotheses: The source's small stable infinity-category and Waldhausen hypotheses apply in the respective passages.
Reading limits: Read the cited definition and remark only; this reference identifies the functor and supplies context, not a claimed local proof of the general comparison.
Sources
- Algebraic K-theory of stable ∞-categories via binary complexes · Section 2.2, paragraph immediately preceding Lemma 2.12
- A universal characterization of higher algebraic K-theory · Definition 9.6 and Remark 9.33