Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Motivic projective bundle formula

PDF p. 2: Motivic projective bundle property; PDF p. 8: Orientation for the splitting principle

Statement

Assume AC. On the article category of qcqs k-schemes, the supplied motivic cohomology, with Ha,b(X)=0 explicitly for b<0, is an additively oriented bigraded theory satisfying the projective bundle contract. This holds over any field k (hence in particular the article’s algebraically closed base), without smoothness, reducedness, Noetherianity or dimension hypotheses. Its ring is the actual EM graded cup-product ring and its orientation is EM Definition5.2. For a bundle E of constant rank r>0, the quotient convention PX(E)=Proj⁡XSym⁡(E) with ξ=c1(O(1)) gives, for every (a,b)∈Z2, ⨁m=0r−1Ha−2m,b−m(X)→ ∑mπ∗(−)ξm Ha,b(PX(E)), a natural isomorphism. No rank-zero projective-bundle assertion is required.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice, as formulated in The Axiom of Choice. It discharges the choice hypotheses of the projective-bundle contract in steps 1.1–1.2 and of all three projective-bundle suppliers in [F3] in step 2.1.

[F1]

Motivic complexes and cohomology fixes the groups in nonnegative weight. Natural unital bigraded motivic ring with negative zero extension supplies the extension, natural ring and first-degree sign.

[F2]

The actual EM first Chern class is additive and natural supplies the actual additive natural first Chern class.

[F3]

Quotient and line projectivizations agree after dualizing, The exact projective bundle map in every integer bidegree and Projective bundle closure and naturality of the actual decomposition supply the quotient convention, exact formula in all degrees, and category/base-change requirements. Isomorphism classes of vector bundles specifies the finite locally free bundles.

[F4]

Bigraded cohomology and the projective bundle contract lists the four clauses of the contract.

Proof

Given: The stated scheme category, AC and motivic suppliers.

Goal: Exhibit all four clauses with the actual source maps.

1.1A1F1F4

Use [F1] to define all integer bidegrees by zero extension and the direct-sum ring. Its unit, product bidegrees, associativity, graded commutativity and functorial unital pullbacks are precisely clauses1–2 of [F4].

1.2A1F2F4

Use the map in [F2] for the orientation. Its additivity, zero value on the trivial line and naturality give clause3; no orientation is selected from an arbitrary Picard-group isomorphism.

2.1A1F3F4step 1.1step 1.2∎

Under [A1], by [F3] all projective bundles/base-change maps stay in the scheme category, and the displayed formula is the actual quotient-tautological-class map. It is an isomorphism for every integer bidegree, including zero source/target for negative target weights. This gives clause4, completing the contract and the proposition.

Depends on

Used by · 10

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources