How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The exact projective bundle map in every integer bidegree
PDF p. 2: Motivic projective bundle property; PDF p. 8: Orientation for the splitting principle
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be qcqs over a field, finite locally free of constant rank , , and . For all integers the map given by is an isomorphism, where for .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Assume the Axiom of Choice, as formulated in The Axiom of Choice. In step 1.1 it discharges the explicit AC hypothesis of Quotient and line projectivizations agree after dualizing, inherited from the relative-Proj line-quotient representation. No additional geometric hypothesis is imposed.
External EM projective bundle equivalence with its specified components supplies the complex-level equivalence with components given by the actual pullback and powers of EM’s Definition5.2 class for every nonnegative target weight.
Quotient and line projectivizations agree after dualizing identifies the relevant projectivizations and tautological lines. Natural unital bigraded motivic ring with negative zero extension and The actual EM first Chern class is additive and natural specify precisely the product and Chern class being used.
Proof
Given: AC and as stated.
Goal: Obtain the exact contracted map in all bidegrees.
Regard as a qcqs scheme over the prime subfield of its base field; this does not change its underlying scheme or the supplied motivic complexes. For , apply [F1] to of rank and target weight . Using [A1] to discharge the AC hypothesis of the dual-conventions supplier in [F2], transport its target through that identification. Each component remains for the actual product in [F2]. Taking commutes with this finite direct sum, and . This gives an isomorphism with those components.
The degree of is , even. Graded commutativity therefore identifies with without a sign, giving exactly the displayed map. For the power is the unit, so the component is pullback.
For , every with . All source groups and the target vanish by the explicit zero convention. The unique homomorphism between these zero groups is an isomorphism, and its formula is the same sum with zero entries. This covers all , including negative cohomological degrees; no truncation was taken.
Reading limits
For this repair, read Elmanto–Morrow, arXiv:2309.08463v1, Definition 5.2 and the convention following (5.2), printed p.34, and the component maps, projectivization convention, Theorem 5.24 and its proof, printed pp.43–44. The complex-level equivalence is imported through the external-input supplier in [F1]. Its cited Annala–Iwasa argument and the earlier trace, syntomic and projective-line foundations were not reconstructed.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.