Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The exact projective bundle map in every integer bidegree

PDF p. 2: Motivic projective bundle property; PDF p. 8: Orientation for the splitting principle

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let X be qcqs over a field, E finite locally free of constant rank r>0, π:QX(E)→X, and ξ=c1(OQ(1)). For all integers a,b the map ⨁m=0r−1Ha−2m,b−m(X)→Ha,b(QX(E)) given by (xm)↦∑mπ∗(xm)ξm is an isomorphism, where Ha,b(T)=0 for b<0.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice, as formulated in The Axiom of Choice. In step 1.1 it discharges the explicit AC hypothesis of Quotient and line projectivizations agree after dualizing, inherited from the relative-Proj line-quotient representation. No additional geometric hypothesis is imposed.

[F1]

External EM projective bundle equivalence with its specified components supplies the complex-level equivalence with components given by the actual pullback and powers of EM’s Definition5.2 class for every nonnegative target weight.

[F2]

Quotient and line projectivizations agree after dualizing identifies the relevant projectivizations and tautological lines. Natural unital bigraded motivic ring with negative zero extension and The actual EM first Chern class is additive and natural specify precisely the product and Chern class being used.

Proof

Given: AC and X,E,r,a,b as stated.

Goal: Obtain the exact contracted map in all bidegrees.

1.1A1F1F2

Regard X as a qcqs scheme over the prime subfield of its base field; this does not change its underlying scheme or the supplied motivic complexes. For b≥0, apply [F1] to E∨ of rank r and target weight b. Using [A1] to discharge the AC hypothesis of the dual-conventions supplier in [F2], transport its target through that identification. Each component remains ξmπ∗ for the actual product in [F2]. Taking Ha commutes with this finite direct sum, and Ha(Cb−m[−2m])=Ha−2m,b−m(X). This gives an isomorphism with those components.

2.1F2step 1.1

The degree of ξm is 2m, even. Graded commutativity therefore identifies ξmπ∗(xm) with π∗(xm)ξm without a sign, giving exactly the displayed map. For m=0 the power is the unit, so the component is pullback.

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1∎

For b<0, every b−m<0 with m≥0. All source groups and the target vanish by the explicit zero convention. The unique homomorphism between these zero groups is an isomorphism, and its formula is the same sum with zero entries. This covers all a∈Z, including negative cohomological degrees; no truncation was taken.

Reading limits

For this repair, read Elmanto–Morrow, arXiv:2309.08463v1, Definition 5.2 and the convention following (5.2), printed p.34, and the component maps, projectivization convention, Theorem 5.24 and its proof, printed pp.43–44. The complex-level equivalence is imported through the external-input supplier in [F1]. Its cited Annala–Iwasa argument and the earlier trace, syntomic and projective-line foundations were not reconstructed.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.