How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
External EM projective bundle equivalence with its specified components
PDF p. 2: Motivic projective bundle property; PDF p. 8: Orientation for the splitting principle
Statement
Let be a prime field, a qcqs -scheme, a finite locally free sheaf of constant rank , and . For the line projectivization of the preceding external input, the actual map is an equivalence. Each component is pullback followed by multiplication by the -th power of the specific Definition5.2 class; when .
External input
Import EM v1 Theorem5.24(2). The source proves regular-blowup excision, deduces the projective-space formula from its P¹ formula using Annala–Iwasa’s argument, and then obtains the vector-bundle formula by Zariski descent. This imports that established proof; it does not pretend to reconstruct all its prerequisites. The explicitly displayed components and the first-Chern/product convention are part of this input. It is not merely an assertion that the two groups or complexes happen to be isomorphic.
Depends on
- External EM multiplicative motivic complexes and actual Chern map
- Elden Elmanto and Matthew Morrow, Motivic cohomology of equicharacteristic schemes (arXiv v1) · Theorem5.24(2), p.43, and its proof pp.43–44; preceding explicit component maps and line convention, p.43; Definition5.2 and negative-weight convention following(5.2), p.34
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
The actual map Σ_m c1(O(1))^mπ*: ⊕_(m=0)^(r−1) Z(j−m)_mot(X)[−2m] → Z(j)_mot(P_X^lin(V)) is a natural equivalence in D(Z).
Hypotheses: X any qcqs F-scheme over F=Q or F_p; j>=0; V a locally free sheaf of constant rank r>=1. Terms of negative weight are zero. No smoothness, reducedness, finite type or finite dimension hypothesis.
Reading limits: Read the entire Theorem5.24 statement and proof pp43–44, including its reduction from regular blowups and the P¹ formula, Zariski descent for bundles, and its explicit component maps. Read Definition5.2 and negative-weight convention. Imported the substantial theorem; did not reconstruct the cited Annala–Iwasa Lemma3.3.5 or the earlier complete P¹/syntomic proof.
Sources
- Elden Elmanto and Matthew Morrow, Motivic cohomology of equicharacteristic schemes (arXiv v1) · Theorem5.24(2), p.43, and its proof pp.43–44; preceding explicit component maps and line convention, p.43; Definition5.2 and negative-weight convention following(5.2), p.34