How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
External EM multiplicative motivic complexes and actual Chern map
PDF p. 2: Motivic projective bundle property; PDF p. 8: Orientation for the splitting principle
Statement
Let or . The supplied EM complexes on qcqs -schemes are the shifted graded pieces of the specified multiplicative filtration. In the terminology of EM §2.2, the graded spectra form a natural commutative algebra object for graded Day convolution: there are coherent associative symmetric unital products and unit , and pullbacks preserve this data. Equivalently these induce the usual motivic cup products, with even weight shifts. The negative graded pieces vanish, so for . There is the actual natural map of complex-valued presheaves of Lemma5.1/Definition5.2. Its degree-two source is with tensor-product group law. It agrees with the classical class on smooth -schemes. The maps denoted in §5 are defined using this class and the multiplication just specified. EM writes for the projectivization classifying rank-one subbundles of , with tautological subbundle and its dual .
External input
These are the stated construction and conventions at the exact locators in the source reference, restricted to the completed motivic-complex supplier. Definitions4.9/4.23 take pullbacks in filtered E∞-algebras; §2.2 gives the symmetric monoidal associated-graded construction. Definition5.2 supplies the complex map, rather than a class chosen from group agreement. Import those established foundations. Restriction along the prime-field forgetful functor supplies the same interface on qcqs schemes over any field. No replacement of the supplied motivic theory or K-theory model is made.
Depends on
- Motivic complexes and cohomology
- Multiplicative filtrations and graded products
- Elden Elmanto and Matthew Morrow, Motivic cohomology of equicharacteristic schemes (arXiv v1) · §2.2, pp.11–12; Definitions4.9/4.23, pp.21/27–28; Theorems4.10(1)/4.24(1); Lemma5.1 and its proof and Definition5.2, pp.33–34; multiplication and (5.2), p.34; line convention immediately before Theorem5.24, p.43
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
Multiplicative means coherent unital commutative algebra object, not a bare binary pairing. The graded pieces G_b=Z(b)_mot[2b] carry their actual induced graded products. There is the natural complex-valued first Chern map RΓ_Nis(G_m)[−1]→Z(1)_mot, inducing Pic→H²; multiplying with it defines the explicit maps used in the projective bundle theorem.
Hypotheses: F is a prime field Q or F_p; X any qcqs F-scheme; weights nonnegative, with negative pieces zero. No Noetherianity, finite dimension, regularity, reducedness or algebraic closure assumption.
Reading limits: Directly read §2.2 multiplicativity conventions, Definitions4.9/4.23, Theorems4.10/4.24 negative-weight assertions and their relevant proofs, full Lemma5.1 proof/Definition5.2 and displayed map(5.2), and line-convention paragraph p43. Trace filtrations, all higher-category constructions and the full P¹ theorem foundations are imported rather than reconstructed.
Sources
- Elden Elmanto and Matthew Morrow, Motivic cohomology of equicharacteristic schemes (arXiv v1) · §2.2, pp.11–12; Definitions4.9/4.23, pp.21/27–28; Theorems4.10(1)/4.24(1); Lemma5.1 and its proof and Definition5.2, pp.33–34; multiplication and (5.2), p.34; line convention immediately before Theorem5.24, p.43