Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Projective relations transport the actual universal Chern operations

PDF p. 17: Corollary 6.9; integral Chern and support comparison

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the existing universe bounds. Under the specified integral smooth-field coefficient comparison, every actual universal projective-relation Chern map agrees in the two theories. For every i≥1, the completed pointed perfect-K-space Chern maps agree after applying the coefficient comparison, and so do their maps on every closed-support fiber. The coefficient c0=1 is preserved separately as the unpointed total-series constant; it supplies no additive-target support-fiber operation. These are natural map identities on the smooth site.

Facts & Assumptions

[A9]

Choice is inherited through the current smooth motivic comparison and its classical/cycle model. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

A unit-induced integral field coefficient zigzag and The actual EM comparison commutes with the Picard first-Chern map provide actual product/unit/first-Picard-map compatibility. Chern coefficients of the projective relation gives the unique coefficients of the monic quotient-projective relation.

[F2]

External formal universal Chern maps and supported construction supplies the specified formal completion of the actual universal bundle classes, functorially in coefficient maps; it does not identify the result by affine K0 agreement. Motivic Chern classes fixes the original quotient convention.

[F3]

Finite-rank detection of stable pointed motivic classes proves that restrictions to finite BGLn jointly detect stable pointed classes for these smooth-field coefficient targets. Its surjectivity calculation in reduced H2i−1,i(BGLn) removes the possible inverse-limit ambiguity. The resulting homotopy is a homotopy of sheaf maps, so its restrictions are coherent.

Given: A smooth k-scheme and a bundle on it, including universal bundles on classifying stacks, AC and the stated universe bounds.

Goal: Transport the actual higher operations, then their support maps.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3A9

In the quotient-projective relation, the comparison takes ξ=c1(O(1)) to the target ξ, by [F1], and preserves its products and pullbacks. It takes the relation to the same monic relation. Apply coefficient uniqueness, including its stack-level projective-bundle version supplied in [F2], to identify the actual coefficients on each BGLn. These are equal classes of maps of the entire classifying stack, not merely equal values on isomorphism classes of bundles over affine schemes. For i≥1 both universal maps are pointed, and the split basepoint evaluation into the abelian derived target makes forgetting pointing injective on these mapping classes, as in [F3]. Thus their finite-rank pointed mapping classes agree. Passing between line and quotient projectivizations uses the dual bundle, with the same Picard operation.

2.1F1F2F3A9step 1.1

Fix i≥1 and take the two existing stable pointed universal maps on BGL∞ supplied by [F2], placing their targets in one coefficient theory using [F1]. Step 1.1 identifies every finite-rank restriction. Apply [F3]: the odd reduced cohomology restriction system is surjective, its R1lim←⁡ obstruction vanishes, and the two stable maps therefore admit a homotopy in the pointed sheaf category. This supplies the missing stable homotopy, with all site-restriction coherences, before completion. No claim that arbitrarily chosen finite-rank homotopies assemble has been used.

3.1F1F2step 2.1

Apply the functorial completion construction of [F2] to the stable maps and the homotopy in step 2.1. Complete, project away from trivial rank, and use the abelian target's completion equivalence. Coefficient naturality identifies the resulting completed maps. Transport through the same natural local perfect-K-space comparison and its canonical local-replacement unit. This gives a homotopy of the pointed perfect-K-space operations as natural transformations on the smooth site.

4.1F1F2step 3.1∎

For a closed subset Z⊆V, evaluate the single natural homotopy of step 3.1 on the restriction arrow V→V∖Z. It is a homotopy of diagram maps, not two independently selected homotopies at its ends. Applying the homotopy-fiber functor gives the comparison of the supported operations, and the fiber projections give its forget-support square. Retain [F2]'s inverse-limit extension if an open complement requires it; no extra category-localization identification is inferred. The separate index-zero identity follows from preservation of the unit: c0=1 is the unpointed series constant and the positive pointed construction is not applied to it. This proves every asserted map comparison with its original smooth scope.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.