Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The actual EM comparison commutes with the Picard first-Chern map

PDF p. 17: Corollary 6.9; integral Chern and support comparison

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the existing universe bounds. Let F be the prime subfield of a perfect field k. Denote by η:Z(⋆)mot→Z(⋆)cdh the actual EM graded comparison, and by γ:Z(⋆)cdh→Z(⋆)A the canonical structured comparison to the represented slice theory. The canonical base-independent cdh identification is understood in this notation. On smooth finite-type k-schemes, the natural graded map θ=γη is an equivalence and satisfies the actual Picard-space square θ1[2] c1EM≃c1A:Pic⟶Ω∞Z(1)A[2]. Together with the unit-induced field zigzag, this supplies an actual orientation-preserving comparison between Spitzweck/classical and EM coefficients. The assertion is integral, also in characteristic p.

Facts & Assumptions

[A8]

The current smooth comparison fixes the ordinary Voevodsky/Bloch model and the actual augmented EM comparison, with its AC premise. Smooth motivic comparison, External actual augmented EM and smooth slice tower comparison

[A9]

Choice is inherited through the current smooth motivic comparison and its classical/cycle model. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

Exact primary unit, Picard and smooth-purity inputs for field compatibility specifies the actual multiplicative maps, their naturality and regular-Noetherian equivalence hypotheses. EM Lemma 5.1/Definition 5.2 fixes its Picard map by (4.9), and the proof describes its Nisnevich-local left-Kan construction. Lemma 5.12, with Construction 5.11, identifies its normalized reduced line class as the actual edge image of 1−[O(−1)]. BEM's Picard map is the actual determinant/edge square (4.36), extended by (4.42).

[F2]

A unit-induced integral field coefficient zigzag and The normalized class detects the actual Picard-space map on smooth schemes supply the unit-induced ring zigzag and actual Picard-map detection; the completed EM Picard supplier identifies the actual normalized first class, not an independently chosen Picard-group isomorphism.

Proof

Given: F⊆k, smooth schemes, the specified coefficient maps, AC and the stated universe bounds.

Goal: Prove compatibility of the actual first-Chern maps before using it to identify higher operations.

1.1F1F2A8A9

On smooth F-schemes, EM defines its spectral first class using the actual graded map (4.9). Remark 4.37 identifies its composite with η as the canonical classical-to-cdh counit. The classical filtration here is the KGL slice filtration. BEM Theorem 7.5 and Remark 7.6 identify its prime-field cdh-local Kan extension with the restriction of BEM's cdh construction, including the filtered augmentation, not just its graded groups. The map (7.14) is induced from the inverse of (4.19) on smooth Z-schemes; after the canonical base-identification counit, its composite back to the represented filtration is the classical slice comparison. EM Lemma 5.12 identifies its reduced line class with the graded image of 1−[O(−1)]. Since these are maps of augmented filtered objects, the structured comparison takes this to the edge image of the same virtual line class in the represented slice tower. By BEM Construction 4.35 and its determinant square (4.36), this is exactly the unit-normalized class c1A(O(1)): det⁡(1−[L∨])=L. Apply Picard-map detection in [F2] to Z(⋆)A[2⋆], whose negative weights vanish and whose normalized class gives PBF. The resulting homotopy identifies the full Picard-space maps. After Nisnevich sheafification on the smooth prime-field site, the source and target weight-one sheaves are both equivalent to Gm[−1] (classically and by BEM Corollary 6.26). A degree-zero map between two objects of the same shifted heart is determined by its homomorphism of abelian sheaves. That homomorphism is detected by π1 after shifting by two and passing to the associated Picard-space map. The preceding homotopy in the functor category therefore identifies the spectral first-class maps on this site. This uses the single-sheaf calculation; it does not infer equality of arbitrary spectral maps from their underlying spaces.

2.1F1step 1.1

This square extends as a square of presheaf maps on all qcqs F-schemes. Explicitly, the proof of EM Lemma5.1 identifies the source Picard coefficient presheaf as the Nisnevich sheafification of the left Kan extension of its restriction to smooth F-algebras (before sheafification the source is (τ≤1RΓZar(−,Gm))[−1]). Both targets are Nisnevich local. By the left-Kan/sheafification adjunction, maps out of that source are determined by the actual smooth-affine maps. Step 1.1 therefore identifies the composites as maps after this construction. BEM constructs its natural first-class map on all qcqs schemes by cdh-local left Kan extension over Z, followed by the Nisnevich-to-cdh source map (Theorem 4.39(4) and Remark 4.45). Restrict this natural transformation to F-schemes. Since its target is Nisnevich local, the same source adjunction determines it from its restriction to smooth F-algebras. Thus the equality in step 1.1 extends to this particular BEM map, without assuming that extension over Z and extension over F are literally the same construction. No comparison of affine Picard groups is being used.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1

Restrict step 2.1 along Schk→SchF. Smooth finite-type k-schemes are regular Noetherian as absolute F-schemes, irrespective of finite generation of k/F. EM Theorem6.1(2) makes η an equivalence on them, and BEM Corollary1.11 makes γ an equivalence in equal characteristic, with the canonical field identification of Theorem7.5/Remark7.9. Thus the claimed square and equivalence hold for every fixed perfect k. Multiplication and units are those of the structured graded maps in [F1]. Inverting these equivalences in the functor category retains the square and all restriction coherences.

4.1F1F2A9step 3.1∎

Transport the actual Spitzweck Picard-space map along the unital field zigzag of [F2]. By [F1], its reduced projective-line class is the unit-adjoint class in the matched Tate-coordinate convention; these unital maps preserve it. The represented theory has zero negative weights and PBF with its actual first class, so the Picard-map detector of [F2] identifies this transported full Picard-space map with c1A. Combine this homotopy with the EM square from step 3.1 and invert the equivalences as natural transformations. This gives the claimed orientation-preserving Spitzweck/classical-to-EM comparison.

Depends on

Used by · 4

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.