How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The normalized class detects the actual Picard-space map on smooth schemes
PDF p. 17: Corollary 6.9; integral Chern and support comparison
Statement
Let be a graded, A¹-invariant Nisnevich ring theory on with zero negative weights in every degree and PBF after every smooth base change; the grading is the shifted one, so in the motivic application. Write for the pointed space of line bundles and their isomorphisms, pointed by the trivial line. Two pointed natural Picard-space maps induced by spectrum maps agree up to homotopy if their classes on agree. This assertion concerns the actual Picard-space maps, including line-bundle descent data, not merely homomorphisms on affine Picard groups.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The proof of BEM Lemma 3.27, imported in Exact primary unit, Picard and smooth-purity inputs for field compatibility, identifies the derived mapping group from to with the reduced group on under precisely these hypotheses. Its proof first establishes equality of the full maps (3.28), before deducing its stated consequence on units.
Proof
Given: and the two maps as stated.
Goal: Apply the actual map-detection statement with its phantom-term hypothesis.
The classifying map is an A¹-Nisnevich equivalence. PBF after each smooth base change and zero negative weights make the reduced coefficient spectra constant for , in all degrees. Thus the mapping inverse-limit sequence has zero term. Restriction of homotopy classes from the suspension spectrum of Picard space to is injective (indeed an isomorphism). These are exactly the steps of [F1].
The hypothesis gives the same reduced class under this restriction, so the spectrum maps from agree. By the suspension-spectrum/Ω∞ adjunction their original Picard-space maps are homotopic. This does not assert a uniqueness theorem for an arbitrary entire spectral map out of beyond the adjoint Picard-space map needed here.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text.