Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: Literature-sourced
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

External actual augmented EM and smooth slice tower comparison

PDF p. 9: Actual low-weight motivic projections and their normalization

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the fixed compatible site and universe bounds for the selected perfect K-theory and motivic-filtration realizations. Let F be a prime field. Construction4.34 gives an actual natural morphism of augmented filtered spectra Fil_cla K(X)→Fil_mot K(X) on Sm_F, equal to identity K(X) on stage zero; Corollary6.4 makes it a filtered equivalence. Its graded comparison maps are exactly (4.9), so they commute with the stage-to-layer maps.

For X smooth of finite type over an arbitrary extension field k/F, use the ACTUAL map Fil_mot K(X)→Fil_cdh KH(X) of Construction4.36. X is regular Noetherian, so Theorem6.1(2)/Remark6.3 makes it an augmented filtered equivalence, over K(X)→KH(X). Remark3.6 explicitly states that Fil_cdh KH is the slice filtration of KGL. Thus the comparison is between the tower augmentations and their induced cofibers, not only cohomology groups. The canonical graded maps and EM c₁ normalization must be retained. On any supported pair, applying homotopy fibers to such a natural comparison gives the corresponding supported tower comparison with these same signs.

Source contract

Given: Choice, the stated compatible site and universe bounds, and the exact maps and field hypotheses just stated; K is the perfect-complex nonconnective invariant used by EM (explicitly precomposed with Perf in Construction5.5), as in the completed run supplier.

Goal: Specify the map-level tower bridge needed when the classical slice calculation is used in the final combined lemma.

[A1] The assumed The Axiom of Choice and size bounds discharge the local realization premises of Nonconnective K theory of perfect complexes and Motivic filtration and image groups whenever the imported maps in [F1] are interpreted as maps of these specified local K-theory and filtration models. These are inherited construction premises, not additional geometric hypotheses attributed to Elmanto–Morrow.

[F1] The exact EM comparison passages listed in the frontmatter give the morphisms of augmented filtered spectra and their equivalence hypotheses.

External input

Import [F1], including the exact status/reading limit: the arbitrary-field cdh-KH/slice identification in Remark3.6 is stated there and attributed to the then-in-preparation joint work [7]; its proof was not read and is not reconstructed. Corollary6.4 by itself is NOT asserted for arbitrary k. Low-weight lemmas below use the direct EM normalized maps of the preceding import; they do not pretend to supply a new proof of this foundational tower bridge. The final supported author must preserve this explicit external-input provenance if using the arbitrary-field bridge.

Depends on

Used by · 4

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

Elden Elmanto and Matthew Morrow, Motivic cohomology of equicharacteristic schemes · Construction4.34 (4.8)–(4.9); Construction4.36; Theorem6.1(2), Remark6.3 and Corollary6.4; Theorem3.5(1),(8) and Remark3.6, pp.14–16; footnote12 p.45

For smooth prime-field schemes, (4.8) is a natural equivalence of FILTERED spectra classical slice K→EM K, identity on stage zero. For regular Noetherian prime-field schemes, the actual augmented comparison EM K→cdh KH of Construction4.36 is a filtered equivalence. Remark3.6 identifies the cdh KH filtration with the KGL slice filtration, and Theorem3.5(8) identifies its motivic cohomology on smooth schemes over any extension field.

Hypotheses: F is a prime field. Corollary6.4 alone only says smooth over F. For smooth finite-type X over arbitrary k⊇F use regular-Noetherian Theorem6.1(2), Remark6.3, and the stated Remark3.6 filtration comparison. Do not replace these actual maps by unrelated graded-group isomorphisms.

Reading limits: Read the complete displayed comparison constructions, the statement of Theorem6.1 and Remark6.3, full Corollary6.4 proof and footnote12, and Theorem3.5/Remark3.6. Remark3.6 explicitly attributes the cdh-KH/slice comparison to joint work [7], then in preparation, and its proof is not supplied in EM v1. This exact stated external input and its source-coverage limit must remain visible. No claim to have read a published proof of [7] or silently extend Corollary6.4 to arbitrary k.

Sources