How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The actual supported third edge sends the positive point class to its residue object
PDF p. 17: Corollary6.9 supported factor calculation
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and the fixed site and universe bounds of the motivic and support constructions. Let be algebraically closed of arbitrary characteristic, let be a finite-type -scheme of pure dimension three, and let be a smooth closed point. Let be the closed immersion. Write and let be the positive fundamental point-cycle class. Put , and define by the analogous restriction fiber of . For this pair, the actual stage augmentation is an equivalence and its stage-to-layer map induces an isomorphism . The supported edge satisfies . It is the inverse of the actual inverse-augmentation leading projection, not an independent group identification.
Facts & Assumptions
External supported slice projection with positive generic coefficient is explicitly a codimension- theorem. For a smooth affine neighbourhood , integral support and , its leading map is stage augmentation inverse followed by slice projection, with coefficient .
External actual augmented EM and smooth slice tower comparison and Augmented tower comparisons preserve supported graded projections identify the actual EM augmented tower and its support projections with that classical tower on smooth pairs. Positive supported coordinates at a smooth threefold point fixes both current coordinates and their excision equivalences. For arbitrary , the tower bridge uses the regular-Noetherian comparison of EM Theorem 6.1(2)/Remark 6.3 and the stated slice identification of Remark 3.6; that identification is explicitly attributed in v1 to then-in-preparation [7], whose proof is not reconstructed here.
The Axiom of Choice is the inherited assumption used by the positive-coordinate supplier and by the perfect-K and motivic constructions in Motivic filtration and image groups. The fixed size bounds are those of these constructions; the edge notation agrees with Third edge homomorphism.
Motivic purity and lower-weight vanishing at a smooth closed point gives for every integer and for each pure-three-dimensional pair used here, including and the smooth affine neighbourhood . Motivic graded pieces and spectral sequence supplies the actual natural graded triangles. Support fibers commute with graded triangles identifies their restriction fibers as the supported graded triangles. Motivic and filtered K theory with support fixes the actual support model and . These assertions use the same Choice and compatible size premises as [F3].
Given: The stated finite-type pure threefold, smooth closed point, algebraically closed and hence perfect field, Axiom of Choice, and fixed site and universe bounds.
Goal: Identify the actual supported augmentation and edge on X before transporting the local positive generator.
Proof
The finite-type schemes and their open complements are noetherian and qcqs, so [F4] applies to the actual restricted tower on . For and every , it gives . A spectrum with all homotopy groups zero is zero. Thus the three supported graded triangles make equivalences. Stage zero is by the actual stage-zero identifications on and its complement. Their composite is exactly , so this augmentation is an equivalence on the possibly singular ambient X.
Choose the smooth affine pure-three-dimensional finite-type neighbourhood of from [F2]. The same argument as step 1.1 gives the actual stage-three augmentation equivalence on . The local ring at is regular of dimension three, so its point support is integral of codimension three; is quasi-projective over the perfect field. Apply [F1] at and transport through the actual augmented comparison in [F2]. Its resulting inverse-augmentation leading map is an isomorphism taking the positive residue class to the positive point cycle. Its domain, projection and sign are the specified actual maps.
Restriction from to commutes with augmentations and stage-to-layer maps by the actual natural triangles and support construction in [F4]. The K-support and motivic-support restrictions are equivalences by [F2]. Because both stage-three augmentations are equivalences by steps 1.1 and 2.1, their commuting square also makes the stage-three support restriction an equivalence. Consequently the leading map is identified by the actual support restrictions with . It is therefore an isomorphism taking to , with the generators transported by [F2]. This establishes the global supported normalization without inferring stage excision merely from K-theory excision.
Since is an equivalence and is an isomorphism, the equality makes an isomorphism. Inverting this equality gives and hence . These are the actual augmented tower maps, consistent with the supported version of the global edge notation in [F3].
The Statement is unchanged. Lower-weight point purity supplies the actual stage-three augmentation equivalence on X; the local slice normalization is then transported through the resulting commuting restriction diagrams. The two direct consumers were inspected and use precisely this same edge and generator. Existing source-version qualifications in [F2], including EM v1 Remark 3.6, remain binding. No fresh reconstruction or independent acceptance of the imported slice or purity inputs is asserted.
Maintenance scope
The Statement is unchanged. Lower-weight point purity supplies the actual stage-three augmentation equivalence on X; the local slice normalization is then transported through the resulting commuting restriction diagrams. The two direct consumers were inspected and use precisely this same edge and generator. Existing source-version qualifications in [F2], including EM v1 Remark 3.6, remain binding. No fresh reconstruction or independent acceptance of the imported slice or purity inputs is asserted.
Depends on
- Positive supported coordinates at a smooth threefold point
- External supported slice projection with positive generic coefficient
- External actual augmented EM and smooth slice tower comparison
- Augmented tower comparisons preserve supported graded projections
- Motivic filtration and image groups
- Third edge homomorphism
- The Axiom of Choice
- Motivic purity and lower-weight vanishing at a smooth closed point
- Motivic graded pieces and spectral sequence
- Support fibers commute with graded triangles
- Motivic and filtered K theory with support
- Kahn and Levine, Motives of Azumaya algebras, published final, JIMJ 9 (2010), 481–599 · Notation p.487; Lemmas 2.3.1–2.3.2 pp.499–500; Definition 3.1.5 p.503; §5.9 pp.531–532 before Lemma 5.9.1; Lemma 6.2.1 p.535.
- Levine, The homotopy coniveau tower, arXiv:math/0510334v1 (2005) · §8.3 pp.46–47 through (8.3.1); Theorem 9.0.3 and Remark 9.0.4 p.47.
- Elmanto and Morrow, Motivic cohomology of equicharacteristic schemes, arXiv:2309.08463v1 · Remark 3.6; Construction 4.36; Theorem 6.1(2), Remark 6.3, Corollary 6.4 and footnote 12.
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
Codimension-at-least-q support gives the stage-q augmentation equivalence; the leading map uses its inverse. Ordinary field K0 uses dimension.
Hypotheses: Perfect base; smooth quasi-projective finite-type ambient; closed support. Apply with q=3 and W the closed point in the smooth affine threefold V.
Reading limits: This round read these statements and definitions, the coefficient passage and Lemma 6.2.1 generic-restriction construction in the primary PDF text. The deeper comparison proofs remain imported through the existing supplier; no whole-paper reading or reconstruction is claimed.
Over a perfect field, the augmentation-adjoint stable-coniveau-to-slice comparison is an isomorphism.
Hypotheses: Use the KGL realization and its coherent augmented tower as specified by the existing supported-slice supplier.
Reading limits: Read the §8.3 opening construction through (8.3.1), Theorem 9.0.3 statement and Remark 9.0.4 in v1 PDF text. The §9.1 proof was not reconstructed; no reading of the published 2008 version is claimed.
Construction 4.36 is a filtered equivalence on regular Noetherian prime-field schemes. Remark 3.6 states the cdh-KH/slice comparison.
Hypotheses: Both V and V minus x are regular Noetherian over the prime field of k; smoothness over that prime field is not required here.
Reading limits: Read these displayed statements, Construction 4.36, Remark 3.6, Remark 6.3 and the Corollary 6.4 proof/footnote in v1 HTML. The arbitrary-field bridge is attributed to then-in-preparation [7], whose proof was not read or reconstructed.
Sources
- Kahn and Levine, Motives of Azumaya algebras, published final, JIMJ 9 (2010), 481–599 · Notation p.487; Lemmas 2.3.1–2.3.2 pp.499–500; Definition 3.1.5 p.503; §5.9 pp.531–532 before Lemma 5.9.1; Lemma 6.2.1 p.535.
- Levine, The homotopy coniveau tower, arXiv:math/0510334v1 (2005) · §8.3 pp.46–47 through (8.3.1); Theorem 9.0.3 and Remark 9.0.4 p.47.
- Elmanto and Morrow, Motivic cohomology of equicharacteristic schemes, arXiv:2309.08463v1 · Remark 3.6; Construction 4.36; Theorem 6.1(2), Remark 6.3, Corollary 6.4 and footnote 12.